The inauguration photos WERE fake. The crowd (and CNN) were real... and the mall was somewhat empty.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/07/politics/...index.html
"Spicer, the White House press secretary, also reached out to the park service, and a staffer said she understood he asked "for NPS to provide photographs in which it appeared the inauguration crowd filled the majority of the space in the photograph."
I try to learn from all things. What I learned from this is when you conclude something already, you might try to go in search of "evidence" to support your conclusion. When, the Scientific Process is just the opposite: go in search of information and THEN form a conclusion (if you can). Do we want to be like the liars? If not, we need to stop seeking information that supports a conclusion and turn that around to the opposite.
A story from The Guardian is much more harsh:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/s...tos-edited
![[Image: 3108.jpg?width=300&quality=85&auto=forma...ce4b7735f8]](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/4e94b06347254f726536400b8f6c32d728aa5298/201_0_3108_1866/master/3108.jpg?width=300&quality=85&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=4627047719e2cc045f1ee9ce4b7735f8)
the images -- left is the actual photo... to the right is the 2008 election mall.
I think the statement was made it was "the highest attendance of any presidential election". What total liars. Guliani will be on CNN later to argue the photo is a creation of an Alex Jones in the left-wing... created to further demean the president in this time of turmoil.. and photographer will soon be under investigation.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/07/politics/...index.html
"Spicer, the White House press secretary, also reached out to the park service, and a staffer said she understood he asked "for NPS to provide photographs in which it appeared the inauguration crowd filled the majority of the space in the photograph."
I try to learn from all things. What I learned from this is when you conclude something already, you might try to go in search of "evidence" to support your conclusion. When, the Scientific Process is just the opposite: go in search of information and THEN form a conclusion (if you can). Do we want to be like the liars? If not, we need to stop seeking information that supports a conclusion and turn that around to the opposite.
A story from The Guardian is much more harsh:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/s...tos-edited
the images -- left is the actual photo... to the right is the 2008 election mall.
I think the statement was made it was "the highest attendance of any presidential election". What total liars. Guliani will be on CNN later to argue the photo is a creation of an Alex Jones in the left-wing... created to further demean the president in this time of turmoil.. and photographer will soon be under investigation.