01-17-2019, 08:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-17-2019, 08:14 AM by Bill the Piper.)
(01-13-2019, 12:37 PM)David Horn Wrote:(01-12-2019, 11:08 AM)Bill the Piper Wrote: Dependence on large-scale organisations like states and corporations is the root of the problem. We have to either go back to more a natural way of life, like the Amish did, or find a way for high tech to be usable in independent small scale communities.
The first option is not just unlikely, it's nearly impossible in today's world. The second option is possible in the intermediate future, but not now. Tech is not that good yet, though it's certainly heading that way. For instance, Toyota, that most staid of Japanese companies, is working on robots for the home. When that gets to be common, the idea of human work will become optional or even recreational. Scale will be of no concern. What human society will look like is an open question I will never have to explore in person. You might.
I was born in 1985, the last Xennial year. Labour should be obsolete around 2200. I don't think I'll live that long, but it remains a possibility. If there are nanobots able to rejuvenate human bodies, or brain transplants...
https://www.futuretimeline.net/23rdcentu...e-timeline
Space colonisation might also be a factor, allowing people to live an idealised version of ancient life in small-scale habitats. Kim Stanley Robinson's novel "2312" explores this possibility.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2312_(novel)
Quote:We're geared for challenges, which may make our soon-to-be less demanding world less compatible with our inborne humanity.
The "power process". Perhaps in the post-scarcity world we will satisfy this need by playing virtual reality games? Or human nature will have to be altered.