03-11-2019, 07:02 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-11-2019, 07:06 AM by Bill the Piper.)
I still prefer the S&H's idea that the Crisis begun in 2008. There were more differences in mood between 2005 and 2011 than between 2013 and 2019, or 1998 and 2004.
Boomers could be broken into Woodstock and Jones cohorts, Xers into core X and Xennial cohorts, Millennials probably into Y (198X-1994) and Z (1995-2002). I'm not sure about the Silents, but GI-leaning Silents born in late 1920s and Boomer-leaning Silents born around 1940 are different.
(03-11-2019, 06:42 AM)sbarrera Wrote: I like the idea of there being dominant versions of what were formerly considered recessive generations. But why not have that for each of the original S&H generations? That takes you to 8 different archetypes. The has better symmetry IMO. 6 is an awkward number for a cycle.
Boomers could be broken into Woodstock and Jones cohorts, Xers into core X and Xennial cohorts, Millennials probably into Y (198X-1994) and Z (1995-2002). I'm not sure about the Silents, but GI-leaning Silents born in late 1920s and Boomer-leaning Silents born around 1940 are different.
