The Partisan Divide on Issues

[Classic-Xer]

(01-30-2020, 03:18 AM). Bob Butler 54 Wrote:

(01-30-2020, 02:44 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(01-29-2020, 08:17 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: Again, you are confused about the term. I use it because it of often used these days. Properly speaking, neo-liberalism is the supply-side economics and opposition to Keynesian economics and falsely labeling it as "socialism" that you favor.

Dershowitz certainly made a fool of himself. He wants a president to get away with misconduct that only a president can do. I don't know how you manage in that mind of yours to attribute what Republicans do to Democrats. The Republicans are anointing a dictator this week. They are certifying that a president can simply ignore subpoenas and obstruct justice. Trump has specifically says that the constitution gives him the right to do anything he wants. He feels entitled to ignore and obstruct any oversight. He feels entitled to use hush money and his own charity's funds to support his political campaigns, and to bribe foreign governments with public money to smear his election opponents.

What you say the Democrats need to do, is exactly what the Republicans need to do.

I wonder what will happen after the election. It does not look good. If Trump wins, he will consolidate power, break the law at will, and assume dictatorial powers with impunity from the political powers of the country. This will arouse mass and possibly violent opposition, and probably constant strikes. If Trump loses, he will resist being deposed, claim the election was rigged, and incite violent rebellion. The planetary aspects for this period from November through February are ominous.

You may be confused by the term since you say that it has so many different meanings these days. So what does neo liberalism really mean/imply? I assume you have access to goggle like everyone else here.  As far as Trump, I don't see him getting impeached and I don't think a petty misconduct charge is an impeachable offense. I also believe the obvious abuse of power that took place in the House was unconstitutional. You don't bypass a constitutional process and impeach. So, how many of you are willing to pay the price for supporting them? Someone on the Democratic side better step up and show us that the Democrats aren't all the same these days. As far as I can tell, the Democratic party of today ain't anything like the old Democratic party. You'll learn.

Somebody is confused.

Is it time for a liberal to try define what a liberal is?  We have Classic's demonization of who he thinks liberals are, but his list includes many that liberals would oppose.  His demonization sheds light only on Classic.

Anyone?

Lots of liberal people are confused these days. Your speaker and the liberals in House seem to think they were born and raised in England. Does your speaker understand that she and her party members in the House alone do not represent the legislative branch of the United States government and therefore lack the Constitutional authority to dictate and accuse the President of the United State of America and impeaching him for not bowing and caving into their demands. WTF! You went to school like me, you're even supposed to be better educated and more knowledgeable and understanding than me but you don't seem to be these days. 

I suggest the liberals get together and get there shit straight before attempting to define what liberal means. Dude, you went overboard with your use of extreme and now you going over board with you use of demonization. My advice to you, grow up and find a pair because I'm getting sicked and tired of childaults.