Quarantine Shaming and Emergence of Groupthink

[David Horn]

(03-21-2020, 07:06 AM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: I personally think we ought to stick with S&H language and theory and not go with Nomad’s alternate.

I agree. There are plenty of details that can be argued without trying to write another theory entirely.  For example, Mike Alexander casts a wide net, looking at cyclic theories very broadly, and tries to reconcile them -- or not, as the case may be.  He still colors inside the lines.  If we can't agree on something approaching a common set of assumptions, then why bother?  

We all agree that S&H proposed an incomplete theory.  That doesn't make it wrong. Most of us try to add a little or take away some here and there.  For those who  find the theory wrong at its core, moving on is an option.  Marc Lamb took that route.  It's still open to others.