03-23-2020, 05:58 PM
(03-23-2020, 05:50 PM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote: No, I mean it does not make sense. You are attributing your ideas to S&H when they are your ideas. If you acknowledged them as original, I would not be on your case as much. As is, you have the basics of S&H ever so wrong. I have interacted with many folk on many sites. We had one guy who interpreted the Bible as supporting prejudice. Others believe gun prohibition will work, will not bring with it the usual problems of prohibition. But I have not generally been the S&H police, defending their work and ideas from heresy.
I for one am not reacting out of fear, nor are those whom I am interacting with. It is more courage laced with sensible precaution that I have encountered. I’m the INTP, trying to come up with a theory. I use S&H as one basis out of many, but am not shy of saying what is original and letting it stand of its own merits.
But some are still acting out of self interest, the heck with everyone else. That in its extreme is the Unraveling attitude. Some people are clinging to it, refusing to see the need.
You've read a lot (or at least responded to) what I've written in this forum. You would say I don't understand the Strauss Howe concepts? Like, not in a smarmy way, you sense academically I don't understand the material?