Quarantine Shaming and Emergence of Groupthink

[TheNomad]

(03-23-2020, 10:12 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: We are nowhere near a High; the battle has not even been joined.

I've said, I think yall may not or I'm not saying something properly.. that I'm speaking in advance.  The High is supposed to begin in about 8 years.  By that time, Prophet will be 64-82yo.  That's just about expiration time for the top end.  And to consider, 64 is our retirement age range, those people are passing out of "relative influence" based on that alone.  Isn't that what we are really talking about here?

I would even adjust that for the sake of ppl live longer lives in our times.  In my head, that will prolong the change or bleed-over - since it's my personal view Prophet at this stage is standing in the way.  Yes, that's my personal take and not from the book at all, no one's book but my own!  Conceptually, I can't help but connect in my head. 

As the High moves "Higher" (as more problems get solved -- really solved, not just addressed) more Prophet archetype is dying.  Being replaced by the new crop.  In fact, the probably defining trait of Prophet in birth is they do not know and have not experienced the Crisis.  They only know the High and it's why they rebel later.  They have no understanding of the sacrifices made (for them) and, thus, are rather flippant to tear down everything their parents created while they were in the "womb", so to speak.

I know a direct correlation model


it looks like this, it's used in economy 101, it means moving from zero to greater either going right or going up (one thing moves on the x axis the other on the y) and when one moves, the other moves.

As Prophet leaves the scene, problems get solved.

Someone mentioned these same problems would not even have been addressed if not for Prophet.  I mentioned, also, that archetypes change throughout time and with age.  Prophet perhaps sparked the fire of climate care, but could never agree on how to do it.  Example. So, when they cache out, the problem was addressed but not solved.  The "solution" comes only after they leave.  "solution" in this case might be a major increment of change, and not necessarily a 100% solved situation.

That's just how I see it.  I'm reducing it far down to a simmering zeal. It's actually quite logical, this.