04-08-2020, 01:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-08-2020, 09:25 AM by Bob Butler 54.)
(04-06-2020, 11:14 PM)Classic-Xer Wrote: Well, that makes sense, she seems as ignorant and as partisan as you and most others like you here. So, what did those planners do to earn their paychecks during their stint under Obama other than flap their gums, fuck around and act important and accomplish little to nothing. BTW, that is what liberals seem to do best these days.
I see a lot of extremists parroting their extreme and not trying to understand the opposites. Rachel, less so. She is loyal to one side of the partisan debate, but she also reports well of the facts. In response, from a partisan I get only insults and belittlement, not an honest rebuttal of her reporting.
From my perspective, this does not speak well of the alleged rebuttal.
When a blue extremist makes a claim against the red, I at least try to come up with a rational reason why the red believes that way. This is usually not that hard. He lives in a different environment, is presented often with different challenges, and has good reason for his different responses. Some would rather give an insult than a reason. Few place themselves with the shoe on the other foot, and try to think though the reason.
I have heard that the answer is to overwhelm the reason. X is wrong, therefore Y must defeat them at the polls. That might still have to be done. Still, X is stubbornly reluctant to admit that he might be wrong in another environment, reluctant to admit that the other guy has needs too. He would rather hurl insults than think and understand. Meanwhile he uses the thing the opposite side produces, is part of the balanced whole.
That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.