08-29-2016, 06:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-29-2016, 08:01 AM by Anthony '58.)
Quote:I'm seeing them as more neo-victorian than neo medieval. They seem closer to 'the white man's burden' or 'manifest destiny' than the notion of launching a crusade.
I'm also dubious about the upcoming warrior age. Given nukes, major powers are still avoiding taking each other head on. Bush 43's adventures illustrated how insurgent conflicts and proxy support make attempts to occupy colonies difficult. I can see how civilians who can't be drafted to serve and whose country is avoiding direct conflict might strut macho and beat chests, but that's just an offshoot of chicken hawk mentality.
If the Republican Party is faltering, I am looking for something to replace them. You have to at least look at the possibility that the Alt Right might grow into the replacement. I can sympathize with the notion that if every racial, ethnic, gender role group can celebrate their place in society, the heterosexual write males should be allowed to strut and preen if they want to. I find that mildly distasteful, but we don't have to watch if we don't want to.
But they have an awful lot of growing up to do before I take them very seriously.
Once the warrior age begins, the all-volunteer military is obviously toast.
And the Karl Marx vs. Ayn Rand dichotomy will be toast too - possibly to be replaced by this?
http://www.ru.org/index.php/economics/39...eory-prout
"These, and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation" - Justice David Brewer, Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 1892