10-05-2016, 03:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-05-2016, 03:18 PM by Bob Butler 54.)
(10-05-2016, 03:06 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: This bolsters a point I've made repeatedly.
State and local law enforcement and to an extent even federal agencies have been targeted for infiltration by, and have actually been infiltrated by, Nazi and other totalitarian oriented groups. Meanwhile, said groups have been infiltrated by Russian agents. The Russians long ago gave up on fomenting revolution and chaos by infiltrating the Western Left. They realized that although the Western Left are in a sense anti-Establishment, other than certain fringe elements, the Western Left are not especially fond of totalitarianism. The Western Left could not be used to try to tear down the Western pillars of governance. Therefore, the Russians changed course and started to infiltrate the faux "Right." The faux "Right" are the real revolutionary force who could credibly threaten governance.
I'm with you. Agreed. A few nitpicks.
The violent faux right seem to me more reactionary than revolutionary. This might just be a difference in how we use words. Yes, a potentially violent threat, though I don't see the spirals of rhetoric and violence as particularly advanced. Me, I use John Brown's Bleeding Kansas and Harper's Ferry incidents to be the standard for an advanced spiral of violence. Clearly, not there yet.
I also find "The Western Left are not especially fond of totalitarianism" to be a big league understatement.
That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.