11-13-2017, 05:54 AM
(11-12-2017, 12:49 PM)Kinser79 Wrote: I find it amusing that so-called progressives equate valuing families and being patriotic with Nazism.
Which 'progressives', and called such by whom? Valuing families of people that fascists consider pariahs for ethnicity, religion, or sexual composition would seem anti-fascist in my book. During World War II, patriotism in much of the world implied an implacable hatred for Nazism. Fascists invariably exploit patriotic symbols and other expressions, but such is fraud.
Quote:The Guardian is a commie rag that I wouldn't wipe my ass with for fear of getting some sort of disease. That being said, there is clear evidence that Soros was and is funding so-called anti-fa groups which are really anarcho-communists. Problem is anarcho-anything doesn't work. Even the An-caps eventually must admit that a despotism of some form, often a monarchy, will establish itself. Human nature is still animalistic and that unlikely to change in the near future.
This anarcho-syndicalist recognizes the need for police, courts of laws, prisons, and taxing authorities because Humanity has more than its share of people with vile tendencies. I prefer that people drive sober and at civilized speeds and that there not be meth labs or child abuse.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.