Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
baby bust continues into 2015
#4
(01-10-2017, 06:11 PM)Bronsin Wrote: It really doesn't matter if the Dems win the next election or not. By that time, another mid-term will have been held, and that should be enough to eradicate the last of the liberals from the House and Senate because we all know the libs don't show up for mid-terms. We will just have another POTUS like Ovomit that gets stymied at every turn. Good Luck with that, Laffin'..................

(01-16-2017, 05:32 PM)flbones too Wrote:
(01-16-2017, 03:35 PM)The Wonkette Wrote:
(01-16-2017, 02:12 PM)flbones too Wrote: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr66/nvsr66_01.pdf

Back in 1957, during the peak of the baby boom, almost one in ten teenage girl was pregnant. For women in their early 20s, that figure was over 1/4 and as high as almost 1/3 in some states.
Of course, in 1957, what was different is that most of those teenage pregnant women were 18- and 19-year-olds who were married to their high school sweethearts working at the GM factory.  That was considered normal that that day and age.

Yep, my grandmother told me she was the last one of her friends to get married and she was 18. Most of her friends married at 16 and 17.  I know there was  a big surge in teenage marriages and pregnancies during the High era. The trend towards early marriage persisted until the time of the oil crisis in the early 70s. Millennials are definitely having to put off marriage in like wise ages.
My mom graduated college in 1951, at the age of 20, and considered herself a spinster because she lacked a ring. However, she married the following year and became a mother in 1953, when the first of four children was born.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
baby bust continues into 2015 - by flbones too - 01-16-2017, 02:12 PM
RE: baby bust continues into 2015 - by The Wonkette - 01-17-2017, 12:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)