03-13-2017, 11:43 PM
(03-13-2017, 11:35 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:(03-13-2017, 10:58 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote: Hmmmm... My BS detector just outed an internal contradiction.
1. You have a questionaire which which determines "materialism" as it pertains to Eric. However, Eric has done Presidential horoscopes for a few forum members, but of course not all. This means Eric has shitty statistics wrt verifying Presidential scores for accuracy. An thus, Eric needs all input from all forum members to refine his Presidential Detector Horoscope Meter.
2. See............... I've expanded Eric's horizons by telling him where to get a plethora of inputs...
No, silly. Put down your ragweed.
I got my stats about presidential election horoscope scores by looking at the horoscopes of all the candidates. Forum members have nothing to do with it, since none will ever run for, much less ever be elected POTUS.
Let's try again.
Eric, Eric, Eric. OK, there big boy, Forum members will most likely make it to POTUS. Now let's consider the attributes [Eric thinks are important to POTUS getting. ] It's like the MBTI, there must be some number of attributes that forum members have that have +/- attributes wrt getting POTUS. That means you need to get data to refine the attributes, right? It comes down to this:
a. Gather data to refine attribute X as it applies to POTUS.
b. You obviously can't know what attributes/Horoscope signs, as you mentioned, right?
c. The more data you have, then more accurate/important it is.
d. Ragweed: So, which strains of weed should I combine to make the perfect marijuana, "Ragweed, the best sedative". ?
---Value Added 