(09-05-2017, 05:40 AM)pbrower2a Wrote:(09-04-2017, 02:50 AM)Kinser79 Wrote: Also I would respond to PBR but it looks like Rags beat me to it. Let me just say that I don't want the US to Emulate even Germany or Canada or the UK when it comes to free speech. But I think I'll leave this little ditty here:
First they came for the National Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a National Socialist.
It's for innocent people -- and not for pirates, drug traffickers, murderers, rapists, thieves, and child abusers. Or Nazis or Stalinists. It's for people who never did anything wrong.
.
PBR, it is hilarious and sad that you are so profoundly ignorant. Freedom of speech does not exist to protect popular speech. Anyone in the world can say that kittens are cute or that the sky is blue with no repercussions whatsoever. Rather freedom of speech is designed for unpopular speech.
An attack on someone's unpopular speech today is an attack on everyone's speech, popular or unpopular, tomorrow.
Therefore since I value the freedom of speech so highly, it am required like Voltaire to defend it. I spent six years in the country's military doing so, have you?
It really is all mathematics.
Turn on to Daddy, Tune in to Nationalism, Drop out ofUN/NATO/WTO/TPP/NAFTA/CAFTA Globalism.
Turn on to Daddy, Tune in to Nationalism, Drop out of