09-07-2017, 07:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2017, 07:15 AM by Bob Butler 54.)
(09-06-2017, 06:34 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:(09-06-2017, 02:03 PM)David Horn Wrote: If so, then why are so many other nations able to have broad freedoms and restrictive gun laws. I mentioned Australia in my last post, but it's only one example of many. How about Canada?
Australia has had restrictive gun laws for only a fraction of a generational cycle. Recheck them after the crisis war, and things will have changed.
Canada does not have free speech, despite positive influence from the US.
Canada has specific laws against promoting genocide or practicing hate speech. Thus, depending on how you define 'free speech', you can reasonably say that Canada doesn't have free speech. It makes one wonder, however, if the guy saying there is a big deal difference in Canada is in favor of genocide or hate speech? Me, I'm in favor of neither. I'm in great sympathy with what Canada is doing.
What does Canada forbid which one wants to see? What does that say of the 'free speech' advocate?
Australia? It is easy to anticipate that one's values will triumph. It doesn't always go as dreamed.
That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.