Hillary Clinton is honest and trustworthy

[radind]

(05-21-2016, 11:36 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(05-21-2016, 10:33 PM)radind Wrote:

(05-21-2016, 08:39 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: One thing that has been pointed out, is that the Secretary of State's office was subject to hacking, but Mrs. Clinton's server was not. Which was really more secure?

That is not the question if TS/SAP info was improperly handled. That is just a diversion from the investigation of proper or improper handling of highly classified info.
Wait for the FBI.

I don't know what "TS/SAP info" refers to.

From my prior post related to Top Secret, Special Access Programs( 'higher than TS):

Quote:… "The paradigms for these two categories, SCI originating in the intelligence community and SAP in the Department of Defense, addresses two key logistical issues encountered in the day-to-day control of classified information:
Individuals with a legitimate need to know may not be able to function effectively without knowing certain Top Secret facts about their work. However, granting all such individuals a blanket DoD clearance (often known as a "collateral" clearance) at the Top Secret level would be undesirable, not to mention prohibitively expensive.
The government may wish to limit certain types of sensitive information only to those who work directly on related programs, regardless of the collateral clearance they hold. Thus, even someone with a collateral DoD Top Secret clearance cannot gain access unless it is specifically granted.
SAP and SCI implementation are roughly equivalent, and it is reasonable to discuss their implementation as one topic. For example, SAP material needs to be stored and used in a facility much like the SCIF described below.”…