06-03-2016, 09:23 AM
(06-02-2016, 01:16 PM)Marypoza Wrote:(06-02-2016, 10:00 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:(06-02-2016, 07:28 AM)radind Wrote: One fact is omitted: Information is marked because it is classified, it is not classified because it is marked.
The best thing to do is to stop all speculation and wait for the FBI report.
I have no idea what that means. Classified but not marked? Who's to blame for letting classified documents unmarked? How do you blame that on HRC?
---- if she told her staffers to remove the word "classified" from the emails, then yeah, you can blame her
Yes, possibly you could in that case.
But that is not the same as "classified but not marked." That is classified but deliberately and knowingly UNmarked.
I find it dubious that Hillary would run for president while knowing herself that she broke the law and just hopes people won't find out. If there's anything Hillary knows, it is that she more than anyone is investigated, and that she can't hide wrongdoing.
I also find it dubious that her staffers could unmark classified material which Hillary then sends to other staffers of the State Dept. That's what most of her work-related email consisted of. I think some other employees of the State Dept. might know if this material had been marked classified or not. Again, I doubt she could have hid such activities from the Department of which she was the Secretary.