Hillary Clinton is honest and trustworthy

[playwrite]

For those interested in amygdala-dominated 'thinking,' here we have several posters providing excellent examples.

Note again that the Abramson piece provides benchmarks for a politician's honesty and then measures Clinton against those benchmarks.  Notice how none of posters above disagreeing with Abramson's conclusion make any factual or logical counter argument but just conjecture that she's not only wrong but humorously wrong, because, well, gut feelings, inconsistencies (because Faux News said so!), misogyny, etc - that's straight cerebral lobe hijacking by these posters' more reptilian brain part - their amygdala. Of particular note, observe the reinforcing of their dribble that provides the echo chamber that the amygdala-dominated sheeple masters can count on.

In the meantime, talking about the cerebral lobe impaired, we have the Benghazi Committee Chairman, Trey Gowdy, admitting that the most fundamental tenet underpinning the case against Clinton is not reality (i.e., completely batshXt crazy) -

 http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/05/17/...ack/210468

Quote:Benghazi Chairman Contradicts Fox Report, Admits Military Could Not Have Saved Lives In Benghazi Attack

TREY GOWDY: Dana Chipman is an honorable, good man. He served this country with great distinction and he served our committee with great distinction. That was a transcript from one question he asked Leon Panetta and Jeremy Bash. When you see the full transcript -- and you will -- then you will see that what Dana was talking about was a very small point. The posture of the troops, the order that was given by Panetta and the president, how that order was received -- all of that is what we want to ask people about. Whether or not they could have gotten there in time, I don’t think there’s any issue with respect to that -- they couldn’t. The next question is, why could you not? Why were you not positioned to do it?”

Note, Growdy now trying to move the goalpost to why there was no positioning in advance so that there could have been a response.  Let's hope Growdy goes there so that he can explain his full Committee Chair's being so batshXt crazy gleeful about cutting the funding for security at Benghazi and other foreign stations -





Now do we get our $22 million back the government has spent on this witch hunt -

http://benghazicommittee.com/benghazi-by-the-numbers/

- or do we just move onto the next "Clinton lie" that the elites feed their amygdala-dominated sheeple?

Maybe a couple of the amygdala-dominate that post their dribble here can tell us?