The Partisan Divide on Issues

[Eric the Green]

(12-10-2019, 11:50 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: I love the way that you and every other Quasi Socialist acts as if they have some sort of right t tell me what I care about and what I think/believe and what/who I am and so forth. Hint, don't ever do that in real life with anyone other than one of your own because they're about the only ones that people like you are free to do so with these days. Republicans don't need to address those issues that you need/want them to address because those issues aren't viewed as important or as prevalent by their base these day. Reds are pretty much content with whatever they've got, their lifestyle and so forth. I'd say the so called American Empire would be content with keeping what it already has right now. How much of your state is currently American owned vs globally/ foreign owned these days?

I did not tell you what you care about and believe in. I only summarized what you yourself said you care about and believe in. Own up to it and quit weasaling out of it and making threats. You guys are as un-American as you claim we are, and I have no hestitation to tell you or any of your fellow reds that score, if I feel it's necessary. You have a perfect right to tell us what you care about, and you as well as I have a perfect right to tell each other what we think the other side believes.

Thanks for confirming that your side does not care about the issues that face us today. That is the main problem.

The notion that impeachment is a distraction from the nation's business is thus extremely ludicrous.

Many red voters, especially in your part of the country, are not content at all. They are economically and emotionally challenged and frustrated, and misled into voting for someone whose only goal is to destroy the country and boost himself. Let's hope they wake up and vote correctly in their own interests in 2020. I don't know if they will.

The issue I raised is not whether the reds are content with keeping what the American Empire already has. The question I raised to you was whether the reds would compel blue states to remain in the union because they don't want the American Empire to be smaller. In this case the American Empire includes the 50 states, and it would have fewer states if some seceded and became a different state or group of states.

I think the reds would more likely fight to keep states in the union, because they don't want the size of America to be reduced. Reds as a group are interested in American imperialism and making their country great (again). They voted to expand it by approving Bush's imperialist wars in 2004. They want to win so often that they get tired of winning, and to build up the military to make sure it happens. The reds are the side that would fight, therefore, to keep blue states in the union, while the blue side would be willing to let red states go, and in fact would be happy to let them go.