The Partisan Divide on Issues

[Eric the Green]

(06-16-2020, 10:55 PM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(06-16-2020, 03:35 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: You continue to exaggerate the blue violence, when it's mostly over, and you continue not to disapprove of and to excuse the treatment of George Floyd. There have been a few murdered police these days, mostly by people angry at the police, but blue governments continue to prosecute these murders. You continue to deny that you are a racist, when it is mostly blacks whom you accuse of violence, and whites whom you excuse for rampant police brutality against blacks. And the "America" that you defend and believe in is manifestly a white America, and it's an "America" that does not include all of America (North and South America).

I suspect it will be the red side that will initiate the violence, once a blue government takes over again. At that point, it will be your violence that will be met with the violence of the state, and it may not be pretty. It's up to you guys.

I'm not exaggerating, what I stated occurred. Are you dumb enough to deny it? You can sugar coat it if you want but that isn't going to change our opinion of those who participated in the crime.  Do you really think Minneapolis is going to survive a billion dollar disaster caused by a bunch of liberal dumb fuckers associated with the Left.  No big deal for the clueless liberals and you've got plenty of them too. 

I haven't seen a tape of the entire incident. I've seen the beginning and the end and a few camera shots of what took place in between. I don't know enough about the case to have a firm opinion at this point. I'm sorry, I don't have a major stake in Black Lives Matter or the black vote. It didn't look good and I doubt the cop will walk being his knee was clearly on the back of his neck. As far as I'm concerned, it's in the hands of the courts. Me, I'm going wait for the results of trial at this point. I'm pretty sure there will be a day by day account of the trail on all our local news channels.

No, whether we go to war or not is pretty much up to you guys. You see, we aren't going to go to war with an American state. You to dumb to get that but that's normal.

You are denying that the riots stopped and the peaceful protests are what continued. And you don't know who did what. It was not people on the Left, unless you consider angry black youths, white supremacy provacateurs and hungry looters, "liberals associated with the Left." Many of them probably don't even vote. You seem to be focusing entirely on Minneapolis in your concern over a "disaster." I don't know how much damage there was there. I haven't heard of any concern that "Minneapolis will not survive." What I hear about is moves toward dismantling the police department and starting over. That would be wise.

I don't care what your opinion is after seeing an entire tape. I'm not sure there is one. The Courts may not provide a proper verdict, if history is any guide. Right now the tide is turning against police brutality, but how far the tide will rise is unclear. Whether it reaches the jury room for this trial is unclear.

I don't agree there; it's the Right that is dumb enough to go against the state, and they have been threatening it for a while. It is not the whole Right, any more than rioters are the whole Left.

I don't expect a revolt by the Left against a right-wing state to be any more successful than the reverse. Riots are just outbursts, not really an organized revolt. But I expect, according to my indications, that the Left will win control of the state during this decade, so if there's a revolt, it therefore would be from the Right. And the cycles indicate that such a revolt, from one side or the other, is probably going to happen. I expect it would be shorter and not as deadly compared to the civil war though. It could be quite minor; that remains to be seen.