02-28-2019, 04:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-28-2019, 04:21 PM by Eric the Green.)
(02-28-2019, 10:25 AM)Bill the Piper Wrote:(02-27-2019, 11:49 AM)David Horn Wrote:(02-26-2019, 09:05 PM)pbrower2a Wrote: There will be a powerful movement to preserve intellectual work, for that can be the most human of all work. We will insist upon the human touch -- and being the human touch. Musicians themselves will insist upon being live orchestras instead of having synthesized orchestras.
At the least, live music and live theater are usually far superior to the recorded, let alone synthesized, varieties.
While you certainly may be correct, yours are opinions that are not universally shared. There are true-believers in the artistic ability we can instill in AI. I don't agree with that either, but neither of us will be around to see the final verdict on that one.
If computers start creating art, humans won't be able to appreciate it properly. Humans will always prefer art created by another human, brimming with human emotion and sensuality.
That's very true, except for the obvious point that computers and synthesizers have become instruments and media in their own right, used by humans to express that sensitivity.
Just one powerful example among many: