11-17-2016, 04:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-17-2016, 04:25 PM by Eric the Green.)
So you really want more debt as an answer to demographic slowdown (translation, fewer people saddled with higher debt)? More deficits and debt in a period of recovery? $19 trillion is not enough fer ya?
I suspect the real objective you favor is to render government and it's "top down" activities impotent. You can correct me if I'm wrong, tho
I suspect though that there are deficit hawks in both parties that may put a stop to Trump's deficit spending, and thus end his hope for his plan to "bring jobs back" (which it would never accomplish anyway, except for some temporary infrastructure projects). No, the time for this was 2009, and the DINOs first watered it down, and then that same Republican Party that boosts him now, brought the OBama stimulus to a screeching halt in 2011 so they could blame him for the tepid recovery in the next election, which they did.
I suspect the real objective you favor is to render government and it's "top down" activities impotent. You can correct me if I'm wrong, tho
I suspect though that there are deficit hawks in both parties that may put a stop to Trump's deficit spending, and thus end his hope for his plan to "bring jobs back" (which it would never accomplish anyway, except for some temporary infrastructure projects). No, the time for this was 2009, and the DINOs first watered it down, and then that same Republican Party that boosts him now, brought the OBama stimulus to a screeching halt in 2011 so they could blame him for the tepid recovery in the next election, which they did.