12-13-2016, 08:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-14-2016, 05:53 PM by Eric the Green.)
That's an interesting suggestion. She is born around the time of Jill Stein, who has a great score of 16-2. Unfortunately Stein does not have enough of a background, or major party backing, and it's probably too late for her to get that. Who knows, but I'll check out Debbie Stabenow (score may shift a bit if her birth time becomes known).
Good score, 8-3. Not an overwhelming positive number, but better than Trump. Stein and Stabenow have the "popular hero" Jupiter-Uranus trine of 1950, which matches Trump's (and Bill Clinton's and GW Bush's) trine of 1946. She would have to be able to overcome the advantage of incumbency in 2020, but might be aided by the "establishment" new moon of Jupiter conjunct Saturn that year, indicating change of direction as it always does. Sherrod Brown has a strong Jupiter-Uranus sextile (60 degree angle aspect), in effect the same "populist" aspect, which helps his score as well.
Her only negative points come from a Moon-Uranus square, which also appears in Hillary's chart, along with a similar one that is scored the same in Donald Trump's chart. So she may seem unconventional to some people, with some wavering popularity. But being the only negative aspect, according to the empirical data base of aspects, gives her a good chance overall.
At 70 in 2020, do you think she has the ambition, energy and talent to be a good presidential candidate?
Good score, 8-3. Not an overwhelming positive number, but better than Trump. Stein and Stabenow have the "popular hero" Jupiter-Uranus trine of 1950, which matches Trump's (and Bill Clinton's and GW Bush's) trine of 1946. She would have to be able to overcome the advantage of incumbency in 2020, but might be aided by the "establishment" new moon of Jupiter conjunct Saturn that year, indicating change of direction as it always does. Sherrod Brown has a strong Jupiter-Uranus sextile (60 degree angle aspect), in effect the same "populist" aspect, which helps his score as well.
Her only negative points come from a Moon-Uranus square, which also appears in Hillary's chart, along with a similar one that is scored the same in Donald Trump's chart. So she may seem unconventional to some people, with some wavering popularity. But being the only negative aspect, according to the empirical data base of aspects, gives her a good chance overall.
At 70 in 2020, do you think she has the ambition, energy and talent to be a good presidential candidate?