Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Academic freedom and Donald Trump
#1
It looks as if some Trump supporters (including some local Republican Party cells) don't appreciate academic freedom. Above a certain level of sophistication of students (roughly middle school) teachers in some subjects are likely to introduce potentially-controversial positions. Academic freedom does not protect teachers or professors from losing jobs for incompetence (let us say a biology teacher asserting that a frog is a mammal or a teacher of any kind denying the Holocaust) or teacher misconduct (like lewd behavior). Teachers are rightly protected from student misconduct, and are not expected to change their positions on current issues just because there is a new President or that the majority has changed in Congress or the State Legislature. Teachers have the right to their opinions but of course must recognize that there usually is another side (unless a dry fact or a controversy settled definitively decades ago).

Even as a substitute teacher I have had to deal with homophobia, including a time in which a student bragged that he loved to beat gays with a baseball bat. I of course called him on it because such is a crime (assault, potentially murder) and he accused me of being a homosexual. Eventually I turned most of the class against him, which I would never do on a trivial issue. Ordinarily one does not embarrass a student in the presence of his peers because such betrays the teacher-student bond -- but he betrayed that bond by exposing me as a homosexual who deserved to be beaten up. (I dodged the issue of whether I was a homosexual or not because violent crime is consummately dangerous, and I could have never satisfied him that I was straight. I could state that homosexuality was de facto legal in Michigan because nobody has been arrested for homosexual acts per se unless they involve some deed that would be illegal for a straight person, like messing with a child). I got my point across when I said that attacking gays for being gay was as senseless as attacking people for being "dentists or plumbers".

But I know what academic freedom is and is not. I follow the basic rules and the lesson plan, and if someone wants to assert that evolution is a hoax, then I have resources at my disposal... such as that from the neck down we humans are stereotypical apes, that pig valves can be used as heart valves in humans, that DNA dictates what life is, and that Linnaeus created a system of classifications that demonstrate the relatedness of all living things. If someone wants to disparage evolution as contrary to the Word of God, then I must ask whether God forged evidence of evolution to trick otherwise-upstanding people into a damnable sin... God as a Deceiver? I want nothing to do with such a god.

I am about to set up a news story. We may see more of this.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist  but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.


Reply
#2
A professor called Trump’s election an ‘act of terrorism.’ Then she became the victim of terror.

(from the Washington Post).

 For weeks now, nightmares have been jolting Olga Perez Stable Cox awake several hours before sunrise. Sometimes she’s able to fall back asleep, but more often she finds herself lying in the dark, body tossing and thoughts racing, until she’s reduced to tears.
The morning offers fleeting distractions but no permanent relief — a cup of coffee, some Christmas decorating, maybe a phone call from concerned friends.

But the blinds in her home will remain closed, her door will remain locked and the formerly outgoing professor — a woman who has always thrived by connecting with others — will spend another day isolated by fear, weeping, too scared to walk outside.

For as long as she has taught, Cox, a professor at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa, Calif., has prided herself on speaking freely. Then a clip of her calling Donald Trump’s election “an act of terrorism” went viral earlier this month, unleashing a wave of violent threats that forced her to end her semester early and flee her home in suburban Orange County. Now she’s back home, but her life hasn’t returned to normal.

“Now, at 66, I’m paranoid,” Cox said. “It doesn’t feel good at all to be looking over my shoulder and wondering when an unfamiliar car pulls up across the street whether they’re going to take a picture of me or something worse — but that’s my life now. I feel like I’ve been attacked by a mob of people all across the country,” she added. “If they’re telling me over and over again that they want to shoot me in the face, how am I supposed to know if they’re going to do it or not?”

The mob Cox refers to doesn’t wield pitchforks and torches but hate-filled tweets, violent emails and threatening Facebook messages and phone calls. They are a virtual force with limited numbers but a seemingly unlimited supply of hate that has proved just as frightening for the longtime academic.

The video that sparked the hate shows Cox standing in front of her students calling the president-elect a “white supremacist” and arguing that the country has “been assaulted.”

Cox, a psychology professor who teaches a class on human sexuality, referred to Vice President-elect Mike Pence as “one of the most anti-gay humans in the country.” She also told her students that the nation is as divided now as it was “in Civil War times.”
She noted that she was “relieved that we live in California.”

Cox’s comments were recorded by a conservative student in her class who found her statements offensive and decided to share the video with the Orange Coast College Republicans, according to Joshua Recalde-Martinez, a political science major and president of the campus Republican group.

The video went viral, and within days, the beloved professor — who is largely unknown beyond the campus where she has taught for more than two decades — was under fierce attack. Her inbox and voice mail were filled with hundreds of threatening messages that referred to her as “libtard,” “Marxist,” “nutcase,” “vile leftist filth” and a “satanic cult member.”

“Keep your anti-white, man-hating, traditional-values-bashing, islamophile radical views to yourself!” an emailer named Xavier Israel Matamoros wrote. “You are an intolerant Marxist terrorist who causes division by bringing up your one-sided radical viewpoints and intimidating and shaming your non-conforming students. You are a sick, demented, evil b****!”

“You professors teach that Whites are immoral and contemptible if they don’t support White Genocide,” a woman named Jennifer wrote. “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.”

“Go out in the middle of the football field, pull out a handgun, put it to your temple and shoot yourself,” Jim Ernst wrote. “Or better yet, douse yourself in gasoline and set yourself on fire.”

As the threats worsened, she realized she was terrified of being left completely alone, consumed by the idea that around the next corner an unhinged person with a gun or a knife was waiting for her. Campus security began dropping by her classroom, and students started escorting Cox to class and sitting with her during office hours, a period when she would normally be by herself.

“Every time I walked towards my office I was afraid it might have been broken into,” Cox said. “I feared that my home would be vandalized coming home from work each day. No matter what your rational side tells you, it’s still really frightening.”
The harassment crested when Cox received an email from a man named Tim White that showed her home address, phone number and salary and threatened to spread the information “everywhere.” The email referred to Cox as a “libtard, Marxist, hatemonger, nutcase.” It was then, Cox said, that she could no longer stand to be in her home and decided to flee.

The professor turned her final week of class this semester over to a substitute, but Cox said her ordeal continued after the controversial video appeared on the O’Reilly Factor. The host referred to her statements as “gibberish” and “slander” and labeled the professor part of “the totalitarian left.”

“That woman needs a psychologist,” he said.



The Orange Coast College Republicans have filed a formal complaint with the school and hired an attorney, said Shawn Steel, a former chairman of the California Republican Party.

Steel told the Orange County Register that Cox is using her power as a grade-determining instructor to “basically scare and shame students.”

“It’s alarming,” he said. “It’s scaremongering. It’s irrational. It’s a rant. And it doesn’t belong in the classroom.”

Recalde-Martinez, the president of the campus Republican group, said OCC President Dennis Harkins never responded to the complaint, which demands that OCC “immediately take steps to correct Ms. Cox’s behavior and to ensure such incidents are avoided in the future.”
Recalde-Martinez said he has also received threats in the wake of the video’s release and that his group “doesn’t endorse bullying.”
“I don’t feel personally responsible for her situation,” he said. “I do condemn the individual who emailed photos of her house and published those. I think that’s unacceptable, and it’s not something I endorse at all.”

“We don’t see those individuals as representative of what we’re trying to achieve, but we still would like accountability from the college.”
On the Orange Coast College campus, professor Olga Cox’s class on human sexuality has a reputation for being a uniquely open forum, one that functioned, at times, like a communal therapy session for hundreds of students at a time. Cox said she spends the first 20 minutes of each class answering questions submitted anonymously by students. The questions usually involve sexuality and relationships, but in the days after Trump’s election, students began submitting political questions.

Cox said many of her students — especially those who were Muslim, gay or had undocumented relatives — had begun telling her they were scared. Cox, who is gay, told her students she felt the same way.

“I had an international Muslim student who told me he was afraid to leave his apartment,” she said. “I cried with him and I felt so bad because he was so alone and so scared.”

When Cox stood in front of class to answer questions that day, she said her rhetoric was not meant to inflame, but to help reassure her students “that OCC was safe.”

“I read a message from the school president and put together a handout for coping with pain,” she said. “As a therapist, these are things I share with people who are depressed. I basically said, ‘Deal with your feelings and do something positive,’ and I was helping them cope with their fears — that was the intent.”

Cox said that if she could go back, she wouldn’t change her language. She said she believes the controversy surrounding her statements has more to do with her being intentionally targeted than the substance of her words.

Her name has been added to a controversial website called “Professor Watchlist,” which lists the names of about 200 academics across the country accused by a conservative group of advancing “leftist propaganda” and discriminating “against conservative students.”
“This is a very carefully planned plot to attack college professors that they don’t like and disagree with,” she said. “This is being done all around the country. It’s not my fault, and I didn’t do anything wrong.”

Rob Schneiderman, president of the Coast Federation of Educators/American Federation of Teachers Local 1911 that represents Cox, agrees that the problem is not what Cox said, but the fact that she was recorded, a violation of the student code of conduct that was expressly stated in the professor’s syllabus. Schneiderman said the short, edited clip fails to provide viewers with any context for Cox’s statements and could warrant punishment.

“She’s known as an open teacher,” he said. “There’s a petition going around on campus to nominate her for teacher of the year. She’s very well respected on campus, and this was an absolute violation.”

Schneiderman said the union plans to work with school officials to strengthen its free speech policies to keep students and professors safe from “Gestapo tactics.” Many professors on campus, he said, have vowed to resist any attempts by the campus Republicans to dictate classroom discourse.

“Students talk about sexual assault in Olga’s class,” he said. “There are students who have come out in the class. The thought of that going public is really scary.”

He added that OCC has a large international student body, with students from countries where it may not be culturally acceptable to be seen in a human sexuality class. Publicizing the wrong student, he said, could have “serious consequences.”

As much as leaving her home frightens her, Cox said she plans to return to teaching at the end of January. Before then, she plans to marry her longtime partner and continue her healing process one day at a time.

She remains in the throes of a difficult struggle, she said, but that doesn’t mean she’ll quit her job. To quit, she said, would be a victory for the harassers. To find strength, the professor thinks about the beginning of her family’s American story.

“My parents left Cuba so we would not have this kind of harassment and so we would have access to free education,” she said. “They made sacrifices to bring us here, and I’m proud to be an American.”

“It’s just hard to believe that this is happening to me,” she added, “and if this is what America is turning into, we all need to be afraid.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grad...w10&wpmm=1
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist  but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.


Reply
#3
These Fascist lunatics are a threat to a free society. They are exactly the type Popper was talking about when he said that we might have to suppress the intolerant to preserve a tolerant society.
#MakeTheDemocratsGreatAgain
Reply
#4
(12-28-2016, 08:19 AM)Odin Wrote: These Fascist lunatics are a threat to a free society. They are exactly the type Popper was talking about when he said that we might have to suppress the intolerant to preserve a tolerant society.

When those kooks have power to destroy someone's academic career because that person's politics are with a large minority (let alone with the majority) then we have a big problem.  If someone is using the power to grade as a means of getting students to flunk out for disagreeing with the teacher on political or cultural issues, then such is terribly wrong.

I can imagine those "fascist lunatics" establishing right-wing, American equivalents of Fidel Castro's Committees for the Defense of the Revolution that differ from those in Cuba only in the object of support. Liberty depends upon a culture of rationality, decency, and tolerance. Sure, this is America, and it can't happen here. Much the same was said in Germany. Guess what -- Germany became a land of dread of the well-connected and powerful before it started on its course of genocide and military aggression. As Germany became a police state in the mid-1930s its once-renowned universities became diploma mills.

If I were a college teacher I might get into trouble for describing Donald Trump as a demagogue and suggesting that demagogues always bring political calamity because they ultimately make contradictory promises that they must betray while stoking anger at 'the Establishment' and fostering extremism that never has a wide appeal once it is shown. Of course I would use Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, and Juan Peron as examples, along with Hitler and Mussolini.

As the Republican Party increasingly begins to show affinities with such extremist groups as the Birch Society and the President lacks the spine to contest the bigoted David DuKKKe, and it begins to act as if it is the only political game in town, we have  the potential of the demise of democracy.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist  but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.


Reply
#5
(12-28-2016, 08:19 AM)Odin Wrote: These Fascist lunatics are a threat to a free society. They are exactly the type Popper was talking about when he said that we might have to suppress the intolerant to preserve a tolerant society.

I think I have heard something very similar to this a long time ago:  We have to destroy the village to save it.
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. -- H.L. Mencken

If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.   -- Ludwig von Mises
Reply
#6
(12-30-2016, 12:14 AM)Galen Wrote:
(12-28-2016, 08:19 AM)Odin Wrote: These Fascist lunatics are a threat to a free society. They are exactly the type Popper was talking about when he said that we might have to suppress the intolerant to preserve a tolerant society.

I think I have heard something very similar to this a long time ago:  We have to destroy the village to save it.

More like exiling a few troublemakers from the village.
#MakeTheDemocratsGreatAgain
Reply
#7
(12-30-2016, 12:14 AM)Galen Wrote:
(12-28-2016, 08:19 AM)Odin Wrote: These Fascist lunatics are a threat to a free society. They are exactly the type Popper was talking about when he said that we might have to suppress the intolerant to preserve a tolerant society.

I think I have heard something very similar to this a long time ago:  We have to destroy the village to save it.

Education beyond the level of rote memorization and narrow vocational training ideally opens minds so that people can think outside the normal strictures of dogma. A college in which the instructors are scared to disagree with the official ideology of the day cannot turn out people capable of independent thought. Politicians and causes come and go. Basic reality does not change.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist  but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.


Reply
#8
(12-30-2016, 08:09 AM)Odin Wrote:
(12-30-2016, 12:14 AM)Galen Wrote:
(12-28-2016, 08:19 AM)Odin Wrote: These Fascist lunatics are a threat to a free society. They are exactly the type Popper was talking about when he said that we might have to suppress the intolerant to preserve a tolerant society.

I think I have heard something very similar to this a long time ago:  We have to destroy the village to save it.

More like exiling a few troublemakers from the village.

Given the vote totals in the last election it would seem like you want to exile half the population.  Clearly more than a few troublemakers.
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. -- H.L. Mencken

If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.   -- Ludwig von Mises
Reply
#9
(01-03-2017, 07:12 AM)Galen Wrote:
(12-30-2016, 08:09 AM)Odin Wrote:
(12-30-2016, 12:14 AM)Galen Wrote:
(12-28-2016, 08:19 AM)Odin Wrote: These Fascist lunatics are a threat to a free society. They are exactly the type Popper was talking about when he said that we might have to suppress the intolerant to preserve a tolerant society.

I think I have heard something very similar to this a long time ago:  We have to destroy the village to save it.

More like exiling a few troublemakers from the village.

Given the vote totals in the last election it would seem like you want to exile half the population.  Clearly more than a few troublemakers.

No, just the small number of people propagandizing that half of the population. De-Nazification in post-WW2 Germany did not consist of exiling everyone who supported Hitler.
#MakeTheDemocratsGreatAgain
Reply
#10
(01-03-2017, 07:12 AM)Galen Wrote:
(12-30-2016, 08:09 AM)Odin Wrote:
(12-30-2016, 12:14 AM)Galen Wrote:
(12-28-2016, 08:19 AM)Odin Wrote: These Fascist lunatics are a threat to a free society. They are exactly the type Popper was talking about when he said that we might have to suppress the intolerant to preserve a tolerant society.

I think I have heard something very similar to this a long time ago:  We have to destroy the village to save it.

More like exiling a few troublemakers from the village.

Given the vote totals in the last election it would seem like you want to exile half the population.  Clearly more than a few troublemakers.

How long will that support last? Donald Trump did little better than Dukakis in 1988 or McCain in 2008, and we are to give him full power to establish an absolute plutocracy?

There were plenty of dupes who are going to regret voting for Donald Trump and fellow reactionaries when those reactionaries make life miserable for all but a few. There will be jobs, but they will pay very badly.

Of course, no human suffering is in excess so long as the elites get what they want -- as on an ante-bellum plantation or in a fascist labor camp.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist  but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.


Reply
#11
(01-03-2017, 01:54 PM)pbrower2a Wrote:
(01-03-2017, 07:12 AM)Galen Wrote:
(12-30-2016, 08:09 AM)Odin Wrote:
(12-30-2016, 12:14 AM)Galen Wrote:
(12-28-2016, 08:19 AM)Odin Wrote: These Fascist lunatics are a threat to a free society. They are exactly the type Popper was talking about when he said that we might have to suppress the intolerant to preserve a tolerant society.

I think I have heard something very similar to this a long time ago:  We have to destroy the village to save it.

More like exiling a few troublemakers from the village.

Given the vote totals in the last election it would seem like you want to exile half the population.  Clearly more than a few troublemakers.

How long will that support last? Donald Trump did little better than Dukakis in 1988 or McCain in 2008, and we are to give him full power to establish an absolute plutocracy?

In light of Trump's latest effort I must question the validity of your conclusions.  Trump hasn't even got the keys to the White House and he appears to actually be trying to drain the swamp.
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. -- H.L. Mencken

If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.   -- Ludwig von Mises
Reply
#12
It was so egregious that even Donald Trump had to put a stop to it. Nobody dares challenge the word "ethics".
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist  but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.


Reply
#13
(01-04-2017, 02:23 AM)pbrower2a Wrote: It was so egregious that even Donald Trump had to put a stop to it. Nobody dares challenge the word "ethics".

That remains to be seen.  I want more than one data point before I decide about his presidency.  Hell, he is still the President-Elect at this time.
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. -- H.L. Mencken

If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.   -- Ludwig von Mises
Reply
#14
We are going to have plenty of data points once he is President. We know what he believes and we know what he does.

People do not improve because they suddenly get power and wealth.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist  but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.


Reply
#15
(01-04-2017, 02:32 AM)pbrower2a Wrote: We are going to have plenty of data points once he is President.  We know what he believes and we know what he does.
People have been asking Trump if he would run for President and his answer has always been, "No, unless things get bad enough".  I am paraphrasing but it seems that he really didn't want to be president but sees it as a necessity.  As a libertarian I tend to be suspicious of both parties but Trump is on a mission.  His life did not get better by becoming President which suggests that he is on a mission.
As of this moment I see Trump appointing people other than the usual technocrats which unusual.  Trump may be the right person, at the right place, at the right time.  So far, he has done two impossible things by becoming President.  There is a good chance that he may go down in history as one of America's greatest Presidents.  I could be wrong but only time will tell.
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. -- H.L. Mencken

If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.   -- Ludwig von Mises
Reply
#16
(01-04-2017, 02:00 AM)Galen Wrote: In light of Trump's latest effort I must question the validity of your conclusions.  Trump hasn't even got the keys to the White House and he appears to actually be trying to drain the swamp.

Asking others to stop feeding the alligators is not the same as draining the swamp.  He merely asked to return to the status quo ante ... at least for now.   Not an exercise in courage or high ethical standards either.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.
Reply
#17
(01-04-2017, 01:02 PM)David Horn Wrote:
(01-04-2017, 02:00 AM)Galen Wrote: In light of Trump's latest effort I must question the validity of your conclusions.  Trump hasn't even got the keys to the White House and he appears to actually be trying to drain the swamp.

Asking others to stop feeding the alligators is not the same as draining the swamp.  He merely asked to return to the status quo ante ... at least for now.   Not an exercise in courage or high ethical standards either.

The fact that he did it at all suggests that Trump will not behave as the lefties predict.
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. -- H.L. Mencken

If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.   -- Ludwig von Mises
Reply
#18
(01-04-2017, 03:34 PM)Galen Wrote:
(01-04-2017, 01:02 PM)David Horn Wrote:
(01-04-2017, 02:00 AM)Galen Wrote: In light of Trump's latest effort I must question the validity of your conclusions.  Trump hasn't even got the keys to the White House and he appears to actually be trying to drain the swamp.

Asking others to stop feeding the alligators is not the same as draining the swamp.  He merely asked to return to the status quo ante ... at least for now.   Not an exercise in courage or high ethical standards either.

The fact that he did it at all suggests that Trump will not behave as the lefties predict.

He won't be as bad as the "lefties" predict. He will be worse. He stands only for the upper 2% in income -- everyone else can suffer for them for the privilege of living in the purest plutocracy on Earth.

I expect to hate life under Donald Trump.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist  but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.


Reply
#19
(01-04-2017, 04:30 PM)pbrower2a Wrote:
(01-04-2017, 03:34 PM)Galen Wrote:
(01-04-2017, 01:02 PM)David Horn Wrote:
(01-04-2017, 02:00 AM)Galen Wrote: In light of Trump's latest effort I must question the validity of your conclusions.  Trump hasn't even got the keys to the White House and he appears to actually be trying to drain the swamp.

Asking others to stop feeding the alligators is not the same as draining the swamp.  He merely asked to return to the status quo ante ... at least for now.   Not an exercise in courage or high ethical standards either.

The fact that he did it at all suggests that Trump will not behave as the lefties predict.

He won't be as bad as the "lefties" predict. He will be worse. He stands only for the upper 2% in income -- everyone else can suffer for them for the privilege of living in the purest plutocracy on Earth.

I expect to hate life under Donald Trump.

Judging from your behavior it would seem that your hating life has little to do with Trump. Smile
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. -- H.L. Mencken

If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action.   -- Ludwig von Mises
Reply
#20
Republicans are trying to control the political composition of State universities through the state legislatures. Case: IOWA.  And coming to a state near you -- count on it. I would not be surprised to find that ALEC is behind this, and that it is trying to get such legislation passed one state at a time. Today it is Iowa; a couple weeks from now it could be Ohio.  In the end, college professors may be responsible for propagandizing students to believe in a pure plutocracy in which almost all people have the responsibility to suffer for the indulgence of a tiny elite of rapacious plutocrats who have no ethical constraints upon their greed and economic sadism.

Quote:The party affiliation on your voter registration card could block you from employment at Iowa’s state universities were a newly proposed bill by Senator Mark Chelgren to become law. Senate File 288, proposed by the Ottumwa legislator, could bring about a Soviet-style purge of liberal-leaning college staff in Iowa. Chelgren wants to impose an ideological litmus test in order to create a “partisan balance,” based on how Iowa has voted in past elections.

The legislation proposes that a “person shall not be hired as a professor or instructor member of the faculty at such an institution if the person’s political party affiliation on the date of hire would cause the percentage of faculty belonging to one political party to exceed by ten percent the percentage of faculty belonging to the other political party.”

The Secretary of State’s office would be directed to provide voter registration lists to the colleges so that new job applicants’ party affiliation could be checked before the hiring process gets underway. Graciously, Chelgren allows for people registered as No Party to slip through the process without facing the litmus test.

The obvious impact and purpose of this bill would be to ban Democrats from getting hired anymore at Iowa colleges. If you took a survey right now, it’s highly likely that Iowa professors are registered as Democrats at a much higher rate than Republican. So any new hires would be strictly limited to Republican or No Party voters.

Obviously there’s all manner of logistical problems with this idea, not the least among them is that people would simply change their voter registration party to improve their chances of getting a job. There’s also the situation where your official party registration doesn’t always reflect your actual allegiance. Many Republicans in Johnson County will vote in Democratic primaries for local offices because the only real competition is between several Democrats, and vice versa in many Republican counties.

And party affiliation on your voter card rarely translates to activism or outspokenness in the classroom. What good would it do to ban a highly qualified physics professor applicant simply because they’re registered as a Democrat?

Not to mention that many of the faculty hired at Iowa’s universities come from out of state. Is Chelgren going to pull voter lists from every state in the country (and some states don’t even have party registration)?

The most disturbing aspect of Chelgren’s legislation, however, is that it is outright fascist. Republicans haven’t even spent two full months in power at the Iowa Statehouse and they’re already trying to impose a one-party rule in the state in perpetuity. You’re a registered Democrat? You’re banned from getting a job.

Iowa’s universities are supposed to be a place of open expression and discussion of ideas, some of which politicians in Des Moines may not agree with. Chelgren wants to stifle that culture and impose his own partisan ideology by force and threatening people’s jobs.

It’s one more step in the Republican Party’s march away from very basic democratic ideals of the United States. Maybe Chelgren should actually open up and read that little U.S. Constitution pamphlet that he loves to wave around on the Senate floor during debate. Because these days he’s sounding a lot more like a Soviet dictator than an actual American.

http://linkis.com/iowastartingline.com/yzVnD

And if you are a Democrat you might be barred from participating in any faculty that can influence the values of young adults. You might count as a representative of Democrats if you work as a janitor, vehicle mechanic, or warehouse worker or someone in charge of animal care at the School of Agriculture. Mammon forbid that humane values infect American youth. Of course if you want to try to teach liberalism to cattle, horses, or poultry, that will be tolerable exercise in academic freedom.

We have 1429 days, 14 hours, and something less than an hour of this to put up with unless Democrats win big in 2018.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist  but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.


Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Donald Trump and Dictatorial Taste pbrower2a 122 107,065 06-11-2023, 02:22 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Why Donald Trump Got Elected JasonBlack 22 5,019 03-18-2022, 08:07 PM
Last Post: JasonBlack
  Internet Trolls and Donald Trump gabrielle 25 23,156 10-29-2018, 01:06 PM
Last Post: David Horn

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)