The limits of science

[Eric the Green]

(12-20-2016, 01:54 PM)X_4AD_84 Wrote: Don't confuse the limits of science with the limits of things like technology, and, the current version of market capitalism. Science is wonderful. A person who goes forth into the world in a scientifically minded way will experience an unending sense of wonder. Scientific training gives a person keen observational abilities, appreciation of nuances, and the joy of experiencing things like the ever changing face of nature, be it the evolving cosmos, the changing of the seasons or the endless wash of the waves of sensible weather. Ironically or perhaps not so ironically, going forth with a clean, unbiased scientific mind leads one, if one is really, truly, unabashedly unbiased, into the realm of spirituality.

I do concede that there are people with scientific training who are not thus - in such cases they are not fully developed enough to self correct for bias. Training in meditation can help resolve such challenges. Still, in the grand scheme of things, it's better to know and love science than not. In my life experience, scientific people have been those with the broadest most open perspectives, and those who are overly emotion or Id driven tend to be more annoying and worthy of my pity.

I agree with your point that training in unbiased observation can open one up to a genuine spirituality. Like science, spirituality also involves some degree of self-reliance in the realm of knowledge, rather than mere deference to traditional authority. If scientific people understand the limits of science itself, then they can enter the realm of spirituality, and still keep their scientific mind intact as well. A truly spiritual training can, in the same way, lead one to appreciate science. Ask the Dalai Lama. There is nothing more keenly-observational than meditation and spiritual seeking. It is this spiritual training and quest that controls reactive emotions, more than science and reason do. 

If science and scientists do not appreciate self-observation, and the fact that it leads to universal knowledge, then they can and often become too limited and dogmatic, failing to appreciate, as this quote suggests, what really moves society and the cosmos. If scientists do appreciate the place of spirit and enlightened religion, then science is a necessary part of the knowledge we need to understand and manage our affairs. The quest for human knowledge has involved a degree of hubris, that we can fit things into the little boxes we make, and what is needed instead is to be awestruck before the vast and unfathomable reality of "God" and the universe. The connection between science and technology is very strong, and often leads to the idolatry that says that the universe can be explained on the model of the machines we make. It can't be.

Science does not really open people up to wonder, if it leads to the notion that science can fully explain life and the cosmos. Wonder is only possible if we realize that life and reality are an ultimate mystery to human rational knowledge, and that what it calls miracles do in fact not only happen, but that every event and every moment is a miracle beyond explanation. Then one also finds "the peace that passes understanding." The inherent and wonderful change and movement you mention in Nature is indeed a clue that a science that tries to pin things down to static ideas and concepts, ultimately does indeed reveal uncertainty-- which science itself now confirms.

Traditional religion is often dogmatic and narrowing, especially the kind of fundamentalism that now prevails in Red America. Traditional science on the other hand can also be dogmatic and narrowing, failing to keep a proper perspective on the value of the human and spiritual element. So, proper respect for and use of all kinds of knowledge is the best path.

I wonder if, beyond today's dogmatic and ruthless battle of traditional ideologies, that ultimately the reconciliation between today's red and blue (or right and left) cultures involves recognizing the place of both spirit and science.

I am glad for an image that can open up this conversation here again