05-29-2016, 06:14 AM
(05-28-2016, 09:41 PM)Odin Wrote:(05-28-2016, 06:16 PM)Kinser79 Wrote: So then you favor malnutrition and rioting then. Or is that you expect to be able to exploit farmers in the so-called third world to obtain food. Either are in direct opposition to the needs of the vast majority of humans.
Most famines nowadays are political problems, not food supply problems. We can grow more than enough food for everyone and still protect the environment.
I will not deny that political problems are an issue. However, the expectation of that humanity produces more than enough food for itself is negated by the fact that famines occur regularly. Furthermore the heavy use of petrol-chemicals in order to produce those large surpluses of staple grains seems to indicate that producing this large surplus at the same time as "protecting the environment" (which is poorly defined) is not a possiblity. Indeed the most destructive use of land is agriculture yet without it, we are locked into a situation where close to 90% of the human population must starve to death.
Sorry Odin, you have to make a choice, food or 3 inch fish. Everyone else is going to choose the food.
It really is all mathematics.
Turn on to Daddy, Tune in to Nationalism, Drop out ofUN/NATO/WTO/TPP/NAFTA/CAFTA Globalism.
Turn on to Daddy, Tune in to Nationalism, Drop out of