Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GOP vs. PLO
#1
I just saw a news report on CNN. The Republican Party in the USA has rejected the Palestinians completely. How will Mahmoud Abbas react? Or Benjamin Netanyahu? And what about the Palestinian people themselves?
Reply
#2
(07-12-2016, 07:54 PM)naf140230 Wrote: I just saw a news report on CNN. The Republican Party in the USA has rejected the Palestinians completely. How will Mahmoud Abbas react? Or Benjamin Netanyahu? And what about the Palestinian people themselves?

Here is the URL: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/11/politics/g...index.html

Here is the article:

Quote:A push to move the GOP to the right on Israel scored a preliminary victory Monday in Cleveland.

Delegates drafting the Republican National Convention platform approved removing language encouraging a two-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians.

An earlier draft had included support for "two democratic states" -- the policy of recent Republican and Democratic administrations -- but had removed a reference to Palestine included in the GOP platform four years ago.

On Monday, the national security subcommittee of the Platform Committee approved an amendment dropping support of a two-state solution, according to four people who were in the room for the discussion.

Copies of the text are not distributed to the press, who are allowed to view proceedings. CNN obtained a copy of the earlier draft and received confirmation of the new language from multiple sources.

"The U.S. seeks to assist in the establishment of comprehensive and lasting peace in the Middle East, to be negotiated among those living in the region," the approved amendment said. "We oppose any measures intended to impose an agreement or to dictate borders or other terms, and call for the immediate termination of all U.S. funding of any entity that attempts to do so."

The move was a win for a group called the Iron Dome Alliance, which lobbied for the change.

In further moves to distinguish the GOP from Democrats on Israel as the latter party moves further to the left on the issue, the Republican amendment also included new language defending Israel.

"We reject the false notion that Israel is an occupier, and specifically recognize that the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement ("BDS") is anti-Semitic in nature and seeks to destroy Israel," the new version read.

That seemed to be a direct shot at Democrats, who had to fight back a strong movement within their own party, represented by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, to call out "occupation" by Israel in the party platform.

The Monday language also went beyond the early draft, restoring the term "undivided" -- dropped in 2012 -- to refer to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

The full Platform Committee will consider the subcommittee's version of the national security text on Tuesday, where delegates may offer more changes.
Reply
#3
Just another reason to "reject" the Republicans. They haven't the slightest concept of peace or justice. The notion is foreign to them.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive;
Eric M
Reply
#4
(07-13-2016, 03:26 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: Just another reason to "reject" the Republicans. They haven't the slightest concept of peace or justice. The notion is foreign to them.

But they have something they consider more important... the ability to finagle campaign contributions.  

Bribes?  Did someone associate campaign contributions with bribes?

You have to admit, though, that they have principles.  They never would have abandoned the concepts of peace or justice without proper monetary reward.
Reply
#5
The Republican base is full of fundy evangelicals who think that Israelis need to demolish the Dome of The Rock mosque and rebuild the temple before Jesus can come back.
#MakeTheDemocratsGreatAgain
Reply
#6
PLO?

In the wake of the Achille Lauro affair, the popular, if sick, joke was that "PLO" stood for "Push Leon (Klinghoffer) Overboard."

More seriously, we really have come a long way from arch-liberal Herbert Block, aka "Herblock," and his Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoon showing a stereotypical - and, as I recall vividly, decidedly androgynous - figure representing Israel with his back turned toward the edge of a cliff and an even more stereotypical Arab figure telling him, "Back off first and we'll negotiate later."
"It was better with them that were slain by the sword, than with them that died with hunger, for these pined away being consumed for want of the fruits of the earth" - Lamentations 4:9
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Ex-GOP Lawmaker: Trump Is “Illegitimate President,” Should Be Impeached mily 21 1,669 12-09-2019, 11:36 PM
Last Post: married1959
  GOP Far From United naf140230 0 895 01-07-2017, 09:51 PM
Last Post: naf140230
  Local GOP office in North Carolina firebombed taramarie 35 11,102 11-10-2016, 10:55 AM
Last Post: Anthony '58
  The GOP Has Been HIJACKED! Anthony '58 217 69,631 10-14-2016, 07:55 AM
Last Post: Bob Butler 54
  But What If Trump is the GOP's Iturbide? Anthony '58 5 1,963 10-08-2016, 10:51 AM
Last Post: Bob Butler 54
  GOP Fails To Unify naf140230 23 8,403 07-28-2016, 05:12 PM
Last Post: Classic-Xer
  GOP: Kaine is too moderate Dan '82 8 2,612 07-25-2016, 06:37 PM
Last Post: Anthony '58
  GOP Platform to Call for Reinstatement of Glass-Steagall Dan '82 2 1,060 07-18-2016, 06:37 PM
Last Post: Anthony '58

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)