What Republicans do

[Eric the Green]

(02-08-2017, 02:32 PM)Marypoza Wrote:

(02-08-2017, 02:23 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(02-08-2017, 02:06 PM)Marypoza Wrote:

(02-08-2017, 01:14 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(02-07-2017, 09:13 PM)Marypoza Wrote: -- yeah l bring up Bernie. I'll cop to that. He's still relevant. X asked where our George Washington is. Others have asked in different threads where our Franklin Roosevelt is. Answer- he got screwed over last yr & we got stuck with the Donald. This 4T is taking us down a different path

The voters chose Hillary.

-- whatever. The states chose the Donald. Your point is?
Once again you are bringing up that irrelevant bitch. Not me. You

Eric Wrote:I'm not sure Bernie could have beat Trump (9-4), going by Bernie's current 14-7 score on my system. If anything, if I make any changes, his score is more likely to go down than up. And if that happens (I have no plans to further change my system now, but it's always fuzzy around the edges as any number system is), then IF Hillary's Jupiter rising (assuming I chose the right chart for her) is worth 10 points, then she's about equal with Bernie on my system anyway.

But it looks like Trump had the numbers to win on my system, and that the other main indicator that favored the party in power only applied to the popular vote. We're stuck with The Donald, so the only hope for regeneracy lies with the opposition.

Another point I like to make to those who say the 1990s were a long time ago. I say they were only 1 year ago, because we have had less than a year of movement forward since 1995. So, why should any of us assume that 22 years have passed, when only 1 of those years has been lived in a country that was not in stalemate or regression?

Lichtman also predicted Trump would win, based on his system that was only wrong in the year 2000 when the Supreme Court selected the president. So unless Lichtman gave Bernie the "charisma" key that he denied to Hillary, and also didn't assign the primary challenge key to the election, then Bernie would not have won the election either. Lichtman's system is largely based on the performance of the party in power during the previous 4 years.

https://youtu.be/lDXHv5cIBCA

-- l thought Bernie was 10-0. Why are you trying to shore the bitch up?  Your #s were right. Your system worked.ppl asked me after the election  why l wasn't surprised the Donald won. I knew bcuz l went by your #s. Why are you trying to retroactively make her #s better than what they are? That irrelevant pos will never be equal to Bernie btw, shame on you for even thinking it

I can't help what the numbers say.

It's on you that you keep calling her a bitch; not me.

No, as I said, Hillary's numbers went down too.

Scores are scores; Hillary's numbers might have been equal to Bernie's; not sure. There's no shame involved; remember the numbers only indicate which candidate is more likely to win elections, not which one would make the better president. I was with Bernie on that over Hillary; but massively either one over the Drump.

And you can't deny that my opinion of the Drump is being fulfilled.

Your anti-Hillary syndrome needs a cure. All the charges against her were false and distorted. So, keep bringing her up; not my fault.

--& you know this how?

Eric Wrote:Whenever you say "he got screwed over (by the DNC)", that's "bringing her up." That's on you. Get over it.

I never said he got screwed over by the DNC bcuz she didn't.  DNC pimped her all the way & we are stuck with the Donald as a result

No, not "as a result." Not going to argue that again; been over it, and Hillary is done and so is Shultz as DNC chair.

statements above corrected