09-20-2017, 04:22 PM
(09-19-2017, 09:45 PM)Kinser79 Wrote:(09-19-2017, 09:34 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:(09-19-2017, 05:24 PM)pbrower2a Wrote:Quote:As I've said in other threads, burn it down and lets return to a circa 1850 agrarian society; one that simply can't support "government" intrusion like we have today. I would much rather have that and have true freedom than the conveniences of today. As the album title of the Dead Kennedy's said in mockery: "give me convenience, or give me death" - it's become the AmeriKan motto.
Most of us would be serfs if such an economy were to re-appear.
Not in 1850. Serfs could be kept in line when one nobleman with better nutrition and armor, and years of specialized combat training, could take on ten peasants and come out on top. Firearms put an end to that.
Warren, you forget, PBR here desires the "common man" to not own firearms.
With a unarmed or disarmed population it is far easier to enslave them. But that is really an argument for the individual right to bear arms, not that PBR would ever admit that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah: guns are the great equalizer. Of course, in a free-for-all economy, wealth always wins. Your guns? It's been tried. What good is a gun when the rich and powerful can openly hire a professional army. The Pinkerton Agency is a perfect example, having been formed in your ideal year of 1850.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.