05-22-2019, 04:42 AM
(05-22-2019, 04:18 AM)taramarie Wrote:(05-22-2019, 03:51 AM)Kinser79 Wrote:Sacrificing liberty...what if I were to say that the people here were given the liberty to vote if they wanted this law to take place? What f I were to say that disarming from certain guns being legal does not mean the people are still not armed? Why do reds in USA believe that disarming means the people are not protected with guns? They still are. Yes I will hear you are not AS armed as you were in your country, but can you tell me why those sorts of guns are necessary for regular folk and can you tell me in what real life situations is it appropriate to have those sorts of guns? I rather real life situations just as you do of course.(05-20-2019, 11:44 PM)taramarie Wrote:
This is very suitable here in this forum and paints views with EVERYONE here hence we can never see eye to eye. It paints kinsers view UNLESS he can provide proof behind his prophecy of course, otherwise it reminds me of Eric. I will wait and see. I hope he is far more grounded.
My comment wasn't so much a prediction, as it was a statement of fact. Immigrants (legal or otherwise) bring their problems with them. Disarming the population while at the same time importing people from high corruption and high crime countries will inevitably lead to the most criminal and most corrupt being the most armed.
Like I said those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither. It was true when Benjamin Franklin said it, it is still true today.
People voting to take away my freedom is the same to me as a politician doing it to me. You shouldn't get to vote away fundamental rights in the name of Democracy. 1979 Iran was Democracy. Look how that went!