To impeach, or not to impeach

[Eric the Green]

(11-29-2019, 01:41 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(11-28-2019, 03:00 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(11-28-2019, 02:39 PM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(11-28-2019, 05:25 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: The second amendment was not instituted to allow citizens to take up arms against the federal government. That is treason, and that is specifically mentioned in the constitution. From what I have learned, the amendment was instituted because the nation had no army and was dependent to defend itself on a militia composed of well-trained citizens who supplied their own arms. These militias were used to put down revolutions and riots by those who considered the government oppressive, such as the Whiskey Rebellion in 1794, and likely was passed so that southern slaveowners could put down a feared slave revolt.

I know a commie or quasi socialist of some sort would/could view it/feel that way if they were to ever succeed with their goal of taking over or destroying the power of the American government.

If the quasi socialists of some sort take over the American government, as I expect them to do soon with a sizeable, legal voting majority, I expect that the right-wingers who oppose it already have enough AR-15s to stage a rebellion. But it would not succeed, and they would lose their guns then.

Our government's ruling party is not yet determined by which folks have the most guns. I expect Trump would like it that way, since he wants to take over and become dictator to make America great again. After all, he IS Mussolini.

Your previous statement that you support democracy is contrary to your statement above that your faction should be allowed to overthrow a quasi-socialist government of some sort by force of arms if it is duly elected.

I think we would more likely vote to divide as a country at that point. We have the right to do that too. What's the point of going to war to keep some cities and keep a bunch of people that we aren't all that interested in financially supporting and  keeping at this point? Oh, you can call us sore losers, racists, fascists or whatever else as we are voting to do it and you can  call us stupid, racist and whatever else  as our President our troops begin to erect and  secure our national borders and you can  cheer as American run bulldozers are removing the portion of the American border that liberal fools like you had in place to protect you as well. As you already know, Americans don't care and Americans don't stop or get in the way  it's government  doing what its supposed to do that upsets liberals these day.

Another characteristic of your red state utopia would be the likely abolition of higher education, because it's a breeding ground for socialist and atheist opinions like permission for women to have abortions. These loonies would be the majority of voters in your red utopia.

In September, Tennessee State Senator Kerry Roberts (R-Springfield) declared that he wanted to eliminate higher education (presumably only for women, because abortion) which would save America. His excuse: he was on talk radio. He (still) hasn’t apologized.

https://www.wjhl.com/news/regional/tenne...ng-ground/

How do you think your seceded state would do economically if it had no universities?