02-29-2020, 05:05 PM
(02-29-2020, 02:07 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:(02-29-2020, 07:38 AM)Warren Dew Wrote: I believe "missionary generation" may have been in use before Strauss & Howe: they were the ones who went to new lands to do good, and as is often said, "did very well indeed". Obviously there were many who weren't missionaries, but it's a reasonable identifier. The Gilded Age was already a well defined period in American History, so it was natural to name a generation after it, especially a merged Civic and Reactive generation for which the timing fits well. I personally think there were two separate generations there, which makes it less an appropriate name, though "Gilded" could still be used for the Reactive generation that came of age during the post civil war high. In that case you kind of have to use the "Civil War Generation" for the generation that fought, but didn't command, the Civil War.
Theoretically at least, a Reactive generation is supposed to come of age (meaning youth, young adulthood) in an Unravelling, like the Lost and Gen X did. So their youth would have been sometime before the civil war, and the post war gilded age high would have been elderhood for them, when they would have held executive positions in various enterprises and institutions, like reactives/nomads Truman and Ike did in the last "high."
Sorry, you're right. They would have come of age during the pre Civil War unravelling. Serves me right for posting while falling asleep. But yes, they would have been in high postions or enjoying retirement during the Gilded Age, those that were still alive.
