04-19-2020, 10:33 AM
Blazkovitz,
P. 1 The early Bolsheviks were an interesting bunch. They did split between the world wide revolution crowd led by Trotsky and the socialism in one country movement led by Stalin. I would hesitantly say that the Russian mindset has always been and even to this day is more closer to the essence of Stalinism rather then Trotskyism.
P. 2 Actually I have been doing some research into this and I was reading an interesting guy called John Michael Greer. He said that fundamentally speaking Russia and America would create the next two great cultures. Europe is classed as the Faustian culture, based off Oswald Spengler, and that culture is in decline.
America is just getting started but needs a few more centuries to truly mature into their own great culture, which is going to be based more off a more reformed spiritual version of individualism.
Russia on the other hand would found a great culture starting later this century or into the next called Sobornost which is basically a collectivistic spiritual culture centred around the need for individuals to come together for the betterment of Humanity.
I think what he described pretty much nails it. He did say that Sobornost would more than likely heavily influence Europe in the nearby future. I would say in essence that only Britain will not take part but the rest of Europe does lean more closely to Russia and will be interested in the idea.
Overall what you say is pretty much related to this idea and I agree with it. The Anglosphere will always be the liberal prophetic wing and Russia, the more strongman, steady on the ground, faction.
P. 3 I think that the current system of focusing on civic issues will continue until another major war breaks out which looking at history and it's trajectory, I would pinpoint out around the 22nd century too. After the war, there will be another never again moment and I predict world peace will last longer. But eventually problems arise, paranoia grows and things go crazy again. I never like to say anything is permanent.
P. 4 yeah I dont think that centre right will ever be ethnocentric in the Anglo sphere. But there will be a desire to shut the borders due to economic concerns primarily, nothing to do with ethnic interests.
I would say however the Russian and Eastern European consensus is more catered towards a form of ethnocentrism. It's not the alt right mindset of "oh noes! The white race is dying out!" but more the contentment how we shall of a more traditional demographic remaining a majority with slow assimilation of other people over the centuries.
I think, if I am to make a prediction, is that the Anglosphere will, to the horror of the alt right, be comfortable will a multicultural and multiracial society.
The East on the other hand will focus on growing it's its population more naturally and favouring to develop their economies around this concept.
P. 1 The early Bolsheviks were an interesting bunch. They did split between the world wide revolution crowd led by Trotsky and the socialism in one country movement led by Stalin. I would hesitantly say that the Russian mindset has always been and even to this day is more closer to the essence of Stalinism rather then Trotskyism.
P. 2 Actually I have been doing some research into this and I was reading an interesting guy called John Michael Greer. He said that fundamentally speaking Russia and America would create the next two great cultures. Europe is classed as the Faustian culture, based off Oswald Spengler, and that culture is in decline.
America is just getting started but needs a few more centuries to truly mature into their own great culture, which is going to be based more off a more reformed spiritual version of individualism.
Russia on the other hand would found a great culture starting later this century or into the next called Sobornost which is basically a collectivistic spiritual culture centred around the need for individuals to come together for the betterment of Humanity.
I think what he described pretty much nails it. He did say that Sobornost would more than likely heavily influence Europe in the nearby future. I would say in essence that only Britain will not take part but the rest of Europe does lean more closely to Russia and will be interested in the idea.
Overall what you say is pretty much related to this idea and I agree with it. The Anglosphere will always be the liberal prophetic wing and Russia, the more strongman, steady on the ground, faction.
P. 3 I think that the current system of focusing on civic issues will continue until another major war breaks out which looking at history and it's trajectory, I would pinpoint out around the 22nd century too. After the war, there will be another never again moment and I predict world peace will last longer. But eventually problems arise, paranoia grows and things go crazy again. I never like to say anything is permanent.
P. 4 yeah I dont think that centre right will ever be ethnocentric in the Anglo sphere. But there will be a desire to shut the borders due to economic concerns primarily, nothing to do with ethnic interests.
I would say however the Russian and Eastern European consensus is more catered towards a form of ethnocentrism. It's not the alt right mindset of "oh noes! The white race is dying out!" but more the contentment how we shall of a more traditional demographic remaining a majority with slow assimilation of other people over the centuries.
I think, if I am to make a prediction, is that the Anglosphere will, to the horror of the alt right, be comfortable will a multicultural and multiracial society.
The East on the other hand will focus on growing it's its population more naturally and favouring to develop their economies around this concept.