Here's all that you really need to know about the 2015 election at this stage.
The "Blue firewall", 1992-2012, in 2016 (mostly in ruby red as in the source):
Strong Clinton (60% saturation) 242
Weak Clinton (40% saturation) 0
Barely Clinton (20% saturation) 1
Effective tie (white) 0
Barely Trump (20% saturation) 0
Weak Trump (40% saturation) 0
Strong Trump (60% saturation) 0
The Second Congressional District of Maine might be a bit shaky.
Add the states that have gone once for any Republican nominee since 1992 (IA, NH, NM):
(my cautious guess on New Mexico, based on its demographics and paucity of polls)
Strong Clinton (60% saturation) 245
Weak Clinton (40% saturation) 5
Barely Clinton (20% saturation) 1
Effective tie (white) 6
Barely Trump (20% saturation) 0
Weak Trump (40% saturation) 0
Strong Trump (60% saturation) 0
I can't figure Donald Trump's appeal in Iowa.
Add Colorado and Virginia, which so far show decisive leads for Clinton:
(my cautious guess on New Mexico, based on its demographics)
Strong Clinton (60% saturation) 267
Weak Clinton (40% saturation) 5
Barely Clinton (20% saturation) 1
Effective tie (white) 6
Barely Trump (20% saturation) 0
Weak Trump (40% saturation) 0
Strong Trump (60% saturation) 0
My criterion for "strong" is 8%, twice the margin of error.
My criterion for "weak" is 4%, basically the margin of error.
270 wins. That's before I bring up North Carolina, Ohio, or Florida. Or for that matter, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, and Missouri.
The "Blue firewall", 1992-2012, in 2016 (mostly in ruby red as in the source):
Strong Clinton (60% saturation) 242
Weak Clinton (40% saturation) 0
Barely Clinton (20% saturation) 1
Effective tie (white) 0
Barely Trump (20% saturation) 0
Weak Trump (40% saturation) 0
Strong Trump (60% saturation) 0
The Second Congressional District of Maine might be a bit shaky.
Add the states that have gone once for any Republican nominee since 1992 (IA, NH, NM):
(my cautious guess on New Mexico, based on its demographics and paucity of polls)
Strong Clinton (60% saturation) 245
Weak Clinton (40% saturation) 5
Barely Clinton (20% saturation) 1
Effective tie (white) 6
Barely Trump (20% saturation) 0
Weak Trump (40% saturation) 0
Strong Trump (60% saturation) 0
I can't figure Donald Trump's appeal in Iowa.
Add Colorado and Virginia, which so far show decisive leads for Clinton:
(my cautious guess on New Mexico, based on its demographics)
Strong Clinton (60% saturation) 267
Weak Clinton (40% saturation) 5
Barely Clinton (20% saturation) 1
Effective tie (white) 6
Barely Trump (20% saturation) 0
Weak Trump (40% saturation) 0
Strong Trump (60% saturation) 0
My criterion for "strong" is 8%, twice the margin of error.
My criterion for "weak" is 4%, basically the margin of error.
270 wins. That's before I bring up North Carolina, Ohio, or Florida. Or for that matter, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, and Missouri.
The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist but instead the people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists -- Hannah Arendt.