Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Backlash against Speech
#18
(07-22-2016, 12:53 AM)taramarie Wrote:
(07-22-2016, 12:42 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: When you're over here and you hear the same carp for 35 or 40 years, there is no need to "listen" to what I already know they are going to say. Same old trickle-down nonsense. Same o prejudice. Same o stuff over and over. There's no idealism on the other side; sorry Tara.

For example, see if you can recognize someone in this video making the typical trickle-down argument. A hint; he spoke last night. see about 6:30




Same-o same-o, for 35 years. Who needs to listen? They need to be defeated. For good. We need new parties, and a new system.
Are they ALL prejudiced though? I have listened to some of them and they say no they are not. They may stand with the repubs for other reasons. They are not all clones of each other I am sure. Do you know that I was called a racist just because i want to simply listen to the other side? I want to listen to understand the individuals rather than label them all as racists or prejudiced etc. The fact i was labeled a racist simply for listening tells me it has gotten so bad over there that one push is all that is needed for your country to tear itself apart completely. I am genuinely concerned about the labels the smears and the polarization. Do you realize that is partly what is radicalizing both sides?

No, it's not. What is radicalizing both sides are real problems. We have a stagnant economy, foreign terrorists, pollution, people who can't get ahead here anymore. Real problems. And a government that cannot act, because of people stuck in ideologies, and the power of money. But one side has some real answers, while the other side is causing the problems.

What we need to be concerned about, are politicians who use thinly-veiled racism and xenophobia to get people to vote for them, because people are hurting economically or don't like changes, and don't read a lot, and can be hoodwinked into voting for these politicians because of their fears and prejudices instead of supporting candidates who actually have policies that bring progress and solve problems. Somehow people need to get informed about what the real problems are, so they don't support the wrong politicians because of their knee-jerk reactions.

If Trump can't even run a convention any better than this, with among other things, a plagiarized speech by your own wife, how can he run the White House, let alone America?

I say, any Trump bashing is 1000% in the national interest. We need to bash him so bad that his small fingers bleed. We need to bash and smash him into absolute oblivion. No, there's nothing to be gained by "listening" to Trump and his supporters. We already have listened. I bleepin listened to him for 73 minutes straight tonight! There is nothing new to hear. WE HAVE HEARD IT ALL; EVERY LAST BIT OF IT!! It's time to defeat him, and the GOP. I don't like insulting people, and I usually don't. But someone running for president has to be called on for his lies and his nonsense and his failure and smokescreen! Watch that John Oliver show; get to know what we are dealing with here. It's nothing like you have to deal with in NZ.

Polarization is not the problem. The problem is those on the wrong side. Being in the middle is not necessarily being in the truth.

Did you watch the video? Did you see who I mean?
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive;
Eric M
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Backlash against Speech - by naf140230 - 07-19-2016, 10:51 AM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Skabungus - 07-19-2016, 12:51 PM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Eric the Green - 07-19-2016, 01:04 PM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Danilynn - 07-19-2016, 03:56 PM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by playwrite - 07-20-2016, 09:03 AM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Classic-Xer - 07-22-2016, 12:10 AM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Skabungus - 07-21-2016, 07:31 AM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Anthony '58 - 07-21-2016, 07:37 AM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Skabungus - 07-21-2016, 07:53 AM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Eric the Green - 07-21-2016, 01:28 PM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by playwrite - 07-21-2016, 02:43 PM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by MillsT_98 - 07-21-2016, 08:16 PM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Eric the Green - 07-21-2016, 11:56 PM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Eric the Green - 07-22-2016, 12:42 AM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Eric the Green - 07-22-2016, 01:10 AM
RE: Backlash against Speech - by Eric the Green - 07-22-2016, 11:27 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Biden faces bipartisan backlash over Syria bombing Kate1999 0 721 03-09-2021, 07:01 PM
Last Post: Kate1999
  Sen. Josh Hawley isn't a censorship victim, he's a free speech menace Adar 6 1,923 03-09-2021, 05:53 PM
Last Post: stillretired
  Lynching Free Speech: The Intolerant State of America theory 6 3,626 02-02-2018, 05:46 PM
Last Post: theory
  State of the Union Speech, 2018 pbrower2a 1 1,460 01-30-2018, 10:57 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Free speech is a concept unknown by politicians nebraska 0 1,067 12-31-2017, 11:23 AM
Last Post: nebraska
  Recent Assaults Against Freedom of Speech and the Press gabrielle 13 7,577 06-02-2017, 06:22 PM
Last Post: Odin
  Governor Mario Cuomo 1984 DNC Speech Dan '82 0 1,178 07-19-2016, 10:12 PM
Last Post: Dan '82
  Nixon's 1968 RNC Acceptance Speech Dan '82 0 1,347 07-19-2016, 01:57 PM
Last Post: Dan '82

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)