06-05-2018, 11:00 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2018, 11:07 AM by David Horn.)
(06-04-2018, 04:47 PM)TheNomad Wrote: The main reason 911 doesn't get the nod as the Crisis Trigger has to do with timing.
Can you see what you even wrote here? It doesn't get the nod for the crisis because it didn't happen in the time brackets you believe the crisis happened in.
subjective?
Subjective? Of course! All of this is subjective. All I can do is look at the history as it unfolded and decide if the next turning has arrived or not. As far as I can tell, nothing about the post-911 period has any crisis-feel to it. It seemed a lot more like a MIC opportunity: profits for some, war for a few and pass the popcorn for the rest.
FWIW, we discussed this for years after 911, and no one make a strong case for 2001 as the beginning of the crisis period, and there were many who tried. 2001 was early, but not prohibitively so. 911 could have been the trigger, but it shows no signs that is was. This is especially true when you consider the resolution of that event: none of note. Afghanistan is still in turmoil, Iraq is stabilizing, but not in a way we would consider transformative, and the war has just spread to Syria and Yemen. We now have troops in 197 countries and action is most of them, yet the focus of our attention is DJT and his Tweets.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.