Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Next 10 Years: A Deep Sense of Foreboding
#46
(12-15-2016, 09:40 PM)Warren Dew Wrote:
(12-15-2016, 04:11 PM)David Horn Wrote: In other words, Benghazi by a different name.  Sorry, that doesn't fly.  Ronald Reagan never had a problem with the military, and he put 168 unarmed Marines "in barracks" under hostile conditions.  The "barracks" were in the open on an airfield.  The hostiles had higher ground, and just butchered them.  That's true malfeasance, misfeasance and nonfeasance, yet he got a bye anyway -- because he was a Republican.

Reagan did not refuse to send in aid that was available - granted, that was Obama not Clinton - and Reagan did not later go into denial about it, the way Clinton's quoted remark does.  Instead, Reagan adjusted his tactics and won.  Soldiers like victory.

After the incident with the Marines in Lebanon, we packed-up and left.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: The Next 10 Years: A Deep Sense of Foreboding - by David Horn - 12-17-2016, 07:32 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How 'fifty years later' looked -fifty years ago. pbrower2a 0 3,181 01-02-2019, 07:42 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)