Poll: Is this a good idea?
Yes.
No.
[Show Results]
 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Breaking the idea that saeculums are ~85 years
#13
(07-01-2019, 02:22 AM)Eric the Green Wrote: S&H cut off the Awakening in Generations in 1980, but changed it to 1984 in T4T, which makes much more sense. The first 80s years were in a rather wasted holding pattern; the Awakening had lost much of its steam, but still continued (the anti-nuc movement, for example). Only when the so-called boom began in 1983 and Reagan pronouned it "morning in America" and foolish Americans believed him, did the neo-liberal 3T begin.

Still, didn't the fact that Americans wanted Reagan, and Brits wanted Thatcher, show the 2T is over?

Quote:The 2008 recession was correctly identified by Mr. Howe as the start of the 4T. The Iraq War was just a 3T mess from the start.

My point was that already during the Iraqi civil war it was "decided" that Iraqi Freedom was a failure. The anti-wars won, and neoconservatism was discredited. Bush's troop surge was never popular. The change promised by Obama for many voters meant troops going home.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Breaking the idea that saeculums are ~85 years - by Bill the Piper - 07-01-2019, 04:42 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  My Generation, Our Generations. Who created the idea? Who did! Eric the Green 0 1,706 05-13-2020, 07:32 PM
Last Post: Eric the Green

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)