01-08-2018, 11:36 AM
(01-07-2018, 11:48 AM)Cynic Hero 86 Wrote: > nobody wants to unite around globalist democracy.
(01-07-2018, 01:13 PM)Kinser79 Wrote: > You may or may not be a globalist. I'll reserve comment as to that
> at this time.
Words like "globalist," "isolationist," "liberal," "conservative," and
so forth don't even make sense when applied to me, or Generational
Dynamics analyses, any more than they would make sense when applied to
Einstein's theory of relativity.
I write articles based on a specific semi-mathematical methodology.
It's not anywhere near as precise as something like relatively,
but it's getting a lot better and more precise with new developments.
In particular, the theoretical development in the last five years of
generational patterns in the decades following a crisis civil war has
been a major breakthrough in Generational Dynamics. So when I write
articles about faraway places with strange sounding names, far away
over the sea, such as Syria, DRC, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, and so
forth, these analyses are not influenced by politics or ideology, but
by a non-ideological generational analysis.
In other words, Generational Dynamics analyses tell you what's really
happening in the real world, and they have a near 100% accuracy, while
analyses based on ideology by journalists, politicians, analysts, and
so forth, are rarely more than 50% accurate, which makes those
analyses no better than flipping a coin. The people who criticize me
are not really criticizing me -- they're actually criticizing the real
world, because it isn't doing what their ideology says it should be
doing, or what they want it to be doing in their erotic dreams. The
harsher a critic criticizes me, the more out of touch he is with the
real world.