09-19-2016, 12:09 AM
Kinser back in his Marxist phase endorsed Trump as he was the candidate most likely to trigger a Marxist revolution. I'm less likely to see support for Marx than he was, but I do note that the presidents leading up to the transformative presidents... Buchanan and Hoover... were pretty (expletive deleted) bad. If there is room in The Theory to suggest that transformation to a new set of values has to be preceded by the utter and complete failure of the old, it might follow that if we're going to get our regeneracy, we need and absolute disaster of a president.
I'm not thrilled by this approach. Bush 43 was very very bad. If he wasn't enough to show the People a need for change, it would take a really botched up president to kick things off.
Judging from how he has botched his campaign, Trump has the potential....
I'm not thrilled by this approach. Bush 43 was very very bad. If he wasn't enough to show the People a need for change, it would take a really botched up president to kick things off.
Judging from how he has botched his campaign, Trump has the potential....
That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.