01-26-2017, 02:02 PM
(01-26-2017, 01:57 PM)Marypoza Wrote:(01-26-2017, 01:48 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:(01-26-2017, 01:15 PM)Marypoza Wrote:(01-09-2017, 04:47 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:(01-07-2017, 07:52 PM)radind Wrote: We have totally different views of the situation. I was concerned about the future of the USA if Clinton had been elected.
I expect reforms to help US business and jobs. We will know later.
There was no basis for concern for the future if Clinton had been elected.
-- wtf??!!!!??????? Eric, the bitch was trying to start a war with Russia. Not some pisspot on the other side of the world, but Russia.. on the other side of the Bering Strait. If you slap a bridge across that sukkah it only takes around an hr to get there. Or for them to get here. I'm guessing boats can cross it in pretty much the same amt of time. Do you (& the other $hillbots around here) honestly think that if she had droned Russia (or whatever hostile act) they wouldn't have invaded us? If so, then y'all are nuttier than she is
You guys are entirely wrong, Marypoza. Hillary was a diplomat and was entirely aware of the dangers. It was supremely important to help the free Syrians from the continual genocidal war crimes committed by Assad and the Russians. That massacre is endangering the liberal consensus in Europe because of all the refugees, and contributed to Trumpbrexit. We may have no alternative to the Trump world now, because Hillary was unable to help the Syrians.
--she can shove her brand of "diplomacy" where the sun don't shine. I for one, much prefer Tulsi's:
http://time.com/4649555/tulsi-gabbard-ba...t-meeting/
Tulsi was entirely wrong on Syria, and is promoting lies.