Countdown to a Free America

[Eric the Green]

(04-21-2018, 12:21 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:

(04-20-2018, 07:08 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:

(04-20-2018, 04:03 PM)Classic-Xer Wrote: You should pay less attention to what is said by a Democrat and pay more attention to what the Democrat does/did with their power, what the Democrat makes/made for a living salary wise to do political work and ask where the Democrat got all their extra income from that made them so rich like the Clinton's? Why didn't I vote for Bill Clinton? I didn't vote for Bill Clinton because I believed that he was a criminal and I viewed him as being a criminal. He was a decent, smart, talented, decent looking and likeable criminal for a criminal but he was still viewed as a criminal by me. Hilary...Well, I'll just say she didn't have the likable qualities that her life long  partner in crime had going for him. However, I'll give her credit for being the brain in their relationship. How much money did the Clinton's make from being involved with shady activities, business dealings, political kick backs, back room/under the table deals, doing work for foreign interests broad and so forth? Multiple millions for sure.

I did pay attention to what Hillary did. The only thing I could pin down about the Clintons' dealings in recent times that might be considered shady, was that Bill was given lucrative speaking gigs from those who donated to his foundation. Other than that, the special prosecutor in 1998 could not find anything wrong with their past dealings, except to get him for saying "I depends what the definition of is, is" in his testimony about a blow job, which was not much of a basis for the trumped-up impeachment charge. And all the recent charges against Hillary were lies, or exaggerations. Comey's report covered it well.

Quote:I'm curious, when you place people on ignore or ignore relevant comments/position and obvious signs/ truths/ knowledge and so forth, and continue pumping blue rhetoric and lies and so forth is it because you're egotistical/arrogant and can't handle/accept criticism or accept that you're wrong or is it your job/was your job for many many years that it has become a habit to stick to the blue script/blue narrative and continue pumping blue rhetoric/beliefs regardless of known facts and known situations and so forth that discredit and destroy ones credibility. I should you give you my information and see how well I'd match up vs Trump and Democratic contenders. I won't, I'll just assume that I would match up fairly well and freak you out with my numbers.

Your statement of curiosity is only a rant, so it doesn't give me anything I can reply to. My statements are fact and value based. I don't put people on ignore because of their opinions. So I'll leave that to you to analyze.

But that would be interesting. It's funny, Civic Hero asked me for his score, and I assumed it would show that he appeals to no-one but fascists, but it was modestly positive. Nowhere near enough to win though, and you also have to have the status and recognition needed, and be acceptable to a leading party to get nominated. You can give me your birthday, place, and if you can, time, and I could give you your score, all by personal message. Since you admit you don't write well, that might indicate a lower score than you think. But it wouldn't be hard for you to beat my own score. I wouldn't come across well enough to be elected by Americans as their president, and Americans don't usually vote for passionate crusaders like me, whether left or right. My chart is about like Nancy Pelosi's, and similar to Hillary's chart too. I doubt you could match up well with candidates though, since your rhetoric is so often divorced from reality, poise and coherence. But not always; you never really know for sure until you check.

That wasn't a rant. Rants are rants. Rants don't have much thought involved with them. That was a direct question with what should obvious signs of both knowledge and intelligence being involved with it's writing and waiting to be used to examine response. This is about the third time you clammed up and dismissed, so I think my view of you and my assumptions of what you are actually doing here are pretty close to being accurate. So, I'm good with the sign that I was looking for/expecting.

Of course it was a rant, just about how you disagree with my views, and therefore I'm wrong. Nothing new for me to consider there.

Quote:How would my lack luster writing skills affect my score? Do I have to submit an essay for the universe to read and evaluate and determine that portion of my score? Why would I do that when I know you're biased and you've manipulated results before? Sorry dude, I don't trust you.

It's just a horoscope score on whether you could win a presidential election, based on where the planets are. I can't change where the planets are when you were born. But I think, generally speaking, that writing skills help a presidential candidate get elected, along with other even more important skills. But, I assume, you are not running for president?

Quote:I achieved a much higher status than Civic at the old 4t (a much bigger forum with a lot more posters involved in the political discussions) so my score would be much than his and yours. Dude, I split the Democratic contingency of the old 4T in two and took out the hard line blues and scattered the more prominent blues (mid level government officials of some sort) to cozy blue world of ignore. I figure I'm not on ignore with you because I must make sense to you some how or another on certain issues relating to working class people.

I don't put people on ignore because of their opinions or whether they make sense to me or not.