02-19-2019, 03:49 PM
(02-19-2019, 03:10 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: I'm sure. I won't deny there was a general trend of desires for more freedom in lifestyles. But the self-actualization concept and the human potential movements were not self-defeating self-absorption. My points still stand, I think. I would not agree that the hippies were self-absorbed or hyper-individualists; they were about "come on people now, smile on your brother, everybody get together, try to love one another right now." Hyper individualism that contributed to social disintegration is primarily the responsibility of the neo-liberals, a totally different philosophy and much more political. Of course these neo-liberal tycoons turn everything into a commercial profit-making meme, so some of that occurred with the counter-culture's mainstreamed influence, as well as anything else people might find attractive.
And I still think most of the desire for more freedom in lifestyle was a good thing; it just needs to be more responsible than it was then.
Hippies made a total mosh out of the commune idea, at least all the ones I ran into in my youth. It was mostly oblivious behavior, but it was still toxic. All the meditation and drugs tended to create inward focus. It's hard to be communal under those circumstances.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.