04-17-2021, 07:16 AM
(04-17-2021, 03:04 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote:(04-17-2021, 01:16 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:(04-17-2021, 12:41 AM)Classic-Xer Wrote: I'd say that's an illusion associated with money and I'll leave it at that. As far as it flowing in accordance with natural laws, it's pretty much true. The fittest either have or end up with most of it. There are some exceptions, Kamala Harris comes to mind. She must have a magic pussy to get where she is today. You know what a magic pussy is right. I'd say most if not all of the exceptions are directly related to the Democratic party these days.
Us Democrats have a way of seeing that some money flows away from whom you think are the "fittest." So, when we win, we interrupt that flow and steer some of the money away from the "fit" fat cats. So much for "natural flow" eh? Unless the state is pretty "natural" after all. Humans have never been without one. But as for Harris, yes I think she played her feminine assets very well, but I don't know if she is rich. Powerful, maybe a bit.
You must have missed this sentence. "The fittest either have or end up with most of it." Read my post again, you'll see it. I acknowledged that the laws of nature aren't always perfect. I mean, a corporal being granted ultimate authority over generals defies the laws of nature but nature prevailed.
Replace 'fittest' with either 'most aggressive' or 'greedy' if you prefer, but fittest is simply wrong. Mahatma Gandhi was penniless but more than fit. He is only one of thousands ... maybe millions.
Intelligence is not knowledge and knowledge is not wisdom, but they all play well together.