07-08-2021, 03:21 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2021, 03:28 AM by Eric the Green.)
(07-08-2021, 02:50 AM)Captain Genet Wrote:(07-05-2021, 12:58 PM)Eric the Green Wrote: Animals hunting other animals does not justify humans hunting other humans. Humans are different and an individual human life has too great a value just to be a victim of sport hunting and gun obsession.
I agree that individual human life has immense value and must not become a plaything, but I was thinking about humans hunting hares, deer or boars for meat.
I don't think humans need to do that either, anymore. We have farms, ranches, stores, and delivery guys. You can probably get meat from amazon today.
Quote:Still, Inclusivism does not promote personal responsibility for one's action like true conservatism does. Its main impulse is to blame society.
That's a good point. I think of Mike "Meathead" Stivic who is always replying to Archie about what "society" has done to people, which excuses them.
Of course, he's at least partially-correct. And the Inclusivist sector as I see it is the old Nolan classical cultural or social liberalism sector regarding civil rights and liberties, along with what you have added to it. So it's still about individual freedom to an extent, and this implies some responsibility.
I see Inclusivism as opposed to Exclusivism, which is the essence of social conservatism, both theocratic and nationalist: "our group is better and deserves to rule and dictate to others and to exclude others not in our exclusive group"