11-12-2018, 11:46 PM
(11-12-2018, 11:16 PM)Marypoza Wrote:(11-12-2018, 11:10 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:(11-12-2018, 09:00 PM)Ragnarök_62 Wrote:(11-12-2018, 08:37 PM)Eric the Green Wrote:(11-12-2018, 06:07 PM)Marypoza Wrote: Whyis Ché on this list? & Booker the Big Pharma Hooker "not allowed"? :rofl: why is he "not allowrd"?
Cory Booker? He is not a bad apple, just because he made a few decisions (for good reasons actually, I think, which he backtracked on, I believe) that we don't agree with. If he's a bad apple, then so are half the other Democrats in office, and I don't buy that. But I too wonder a bit about Che. He was something of a cutthroat revolutionary; not always a pleasant kind of person
Well, he's what I'd call a wormy apple! Wormy apples is a term to use for apples which have some sort of infestation tied to them. They can become good apples when cleaned of worms in time. If the worms stay too long, then those kine of apples become bad.The question is is Cory Booker still infested with Big Pharma worms? So, ya better check on Cory Booker.
Might not be the one to vote for. He's a moderate-liberal who only scores 6-7. But a bad apple in the sense here means a really misformed person who is damaged goods and inflicts damage on others. Brower pointed out that political figures might not necessarily fit because it's a matter of opinion. We might not agree with Booker all the time, but most politicians are worse. So, should we include most politicians as bad apples? Maybe, but, maybe not.
-- should we include the Donald? (Uh-hunh l thought so)
Wrt, The Donald. Well, I have algorithm, a spoil apple spoils the bunch. So, that most likely again means lots of worms which do spoil the bunch. That means one should select politicians such that the total number worms is minimal. With those you can do a second worm check to make sure you can have your apples and health too.
---Value Added 