Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I'm a sceptic that the 4th Turning started in 2008
#67
(06-15-2020, 12:23 PM)David Horn Wrote:
(06-14-2020, 06:33 PM)Mikebert Wrote:
(06-06-2020, 12:18 PM)Ghost Wrote:
(06-06-2020, 12:14 PM)Isoko Wrote: Ghost,

These feel more like 3T events. They occurred, they offered minimal change in terms of people's lives and disappeared as quickly as they came. I'm talking about big changes here that lead to a big climax and quite frankly 2008 onwards feels like one big 3T.

But wouldn't that be a huge 3T (1980-2020)?

That would create a 91-year saeculum instead of the usual 80-88 year saeculua proposed by Strauss and Howe.

The average length of the saeculum is 92 years.

You are ignoring the 15 turnings before 1773 (average  saeculum length 104 years) and focusing entirely on the 12 turnings after 1773 (average length 78 years).

There's also the issue of the first major culture delta in the history of civilized man, when the Industrial Age emerged after 12 millennia of the Agricultural Age.  It's simply too important to ignore, and the post-AgAge is too brief a period (roughly three saecula) to be significant in any statistical sense.  So we're at a bit of a disadvantage from that perspective.  On the other hand, we're free to assume that the two are tightly linked or not.  I'm certainly in the loose-link camp.   It seems you're in the former. Since no one alive today will be around to see how this plays-out in the next 4 or 5 saecula, we should all be a bit more circumspect about dating turnings, until it's a bit more obvious. That said, your offered dates:
  • 1t 1946-1968 - 24 yrs
  • 2t 1968-1992 - 24 yrs
  • 3t 1992-2014 - 22 yrs
  • 4t 2014-????
are still possible.  But why 2014?

It's just a place holder. The other dates serve to stretch out the turnings to accommodate what is looking like a longer saeculum than what I anticipated in 2000.

What makes me question 4T start dates of 2008 or 2001 is the lack of structural change to our nation at this point. We are still the same basic country we were in 1984.  Only one of the previous six 4Ts was as anodyne as this one, the Armada 4T. 

In 20 years at T4T in is various guises, I have never seen people draw comparisons between this 4T and the Armada 4T or discuss the latter at all for that matter.  It's so forgettable of a secular crisis. So much so as I am not sure it was a crisis at all.  It seems over shadowed by the mid-Tudor crisis before it and the English Civil War after it.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: I'm a sceptic that the 4th Turning started in 2008 - by Mikebert - 06-18-2020, 01:49 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  There Will Not Be A Triumphant End To This Turning galaxy 33 14,905 11-22-2023, 08:47 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  War & Military Turning & Generational Issues JDG 66 5 5,372 03-24-2022, 03:01 PM
Last Post: JDG 66
  First Turning "purge" Teejay 82 47,794 03-14-2022, 09:28 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  The Civil War 4th turning Eric the Green 6 4,113 11-11-2021, 06:12 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Generational Constellation Math For The Current And Next Turning galaxy 8 3,661 11-09-2021, 01:51 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  What the next First Turning won't be like Mickey123 145 62,166 10-07-2021, 01:15 AM
Last Post: Eric the Green
  In What Turning do Neighborhood Communities come back? AspieMillennial 7 4,301 05-05-2020, 10:15 PM
Last Post: beechnut79
  Why does the Fourth Turning seem to take Forever? AspieMillennial 22 9,879 01-19-2020, 03:30 PM
Last Post: Anthony '58
  Does the UK disprove the Fourth Turning? AspieMillennial 14 6,721 01-02-2020, 12:14 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  What will happen when this turning ends? AspieMillennial 25 10,428 12-30-2019, 02:24 PM
Last Post: David Horn

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)