(04-12-2021, 11:16 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:(04-12-2021, 04:08 AM)Einzige Wrote:(04-12-2021, 02:20 AM)Eric the Green Wrote:(04-05-2021, 09:15 AM)David Horn Wrote:(04-03-2021, 11:29 PM)Einzige Wrote: Anthony has a gimmick in which he postures as an Old-School Nor'eastern Ethnic Democrat, a blue-collar Democrat for Nixon, Reagan, Dole, etc., and he'll tell you wot. It's super sleepy.
These guys -
- were not labor heroes. They were class traitors.
Nothing unusual here -- at least for NYC, where Anthony was born and raised. Conservative labor activist may seem to be an oxymoron, but the 5 boroughs of New York run the gamut from the neoliberal and wealthy UES of Manhattan to the neoconservative and very blue collar Staten Island. Antony is decidedly Staten Island.
Carroll O'Connor played the type so very well.
But I know not what "UES" stands for.
"Neo-liberalism" is a very extreme right-wing view, and I am loth to apply it to liberals or even moderate Democrats, even if partially fitting. No doubt it has been so powerful in the last 40 years that many Democrats bow to it and compromise with it, as Bill Clinton did.
Neoliberalism is not a right-wing view. Indeed, many neoliberals are completely comfortable with State intervention and even some degree of welfare so long as the ownership of the means of production remains in private hands. It is not synonyms with Austrian economics or whatever. It means above all faith in the market to solve social questions- e.g. John Kerry calling for market-based solutions to AGW.
disagree. Kerry seeks government regulation and taxes, and that is not a market solution. Neo-liberalism is synonymous with Austrian economics, and is very extreme. No regulation, no taxes, only market solutions. Neo-liberalism is the Republican Party's philosophy. The Democrats compromise with it. I understand that from your extreme point of view on the other side, it all looks the same.
No, I mean that it literally is all the same. E.g. from Jimmah Carter's 1978 State of the Union Address.
Quote:Government cannot solve our problems, it can't set our goals. It cannot define our vision. Government cannot eliminate poverty or provide a bountiful economy or reduce inflation or save our cities or cure illiteracy or provide energy. And government cannot mandate goodness.
Carter introduced deregulation into e.g. airlines and beer and trucking, and prioritized passing these deregulation efforts over traditional Keynesian goals lime health care. Trying to fob neoliberalism off solely on Republicans or "the Right" is a lie.
What Reagan pushed before entering office was radical economic libertarianism. Capital doesn't actually like that. It isn't good long term. What it likes is "sensible" (i.e. pro-business) regulation and economic restructuring. So Reagan was reduced to pushing neoliberalism from the Right.
Capital has wings. Left-neoliberalism certainly exists - "progressive" identitariabism fused to pro-business policies.