Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Core" vs. "Non-Core" Semi-Generations
#12
(07-31-2019, 10:16 AM)AspieMillennial Wrote:
(11-04-2018, 06:29 AM)Bill the Piper Wrote:
(11-03-2018, 09:25 PM)Ghost Wrote: 1977 and 1978 aren't really indisputably X; Newsweek and Post-Bulletin still label them as Millennials and some still believe that they are in the cusp (which probably lasts until 1981 - the last birthyear that has people graduating in the 90's). 

The Business Insider proposes Xennial as a cusp micro-generation between 1977 and 1985. I agree and identify as a Xennial myself.

Quote:1995-2001 is a big Millennial/Z cusp and even that could be outdated nowadays.

Do you think it should be moved forward or backward?

I used to debate it a lot on Personality Cafe. The only thing the 1995 camp had to say was "Internet Explorer was launched in 1995". Well, it didn't have much impact on politics or even daily life, did it? Social media (MySpace) got popular in 2006, so if you were born in 2001 or earlier you have to remember the pre-social Unravelling days. Also, 2006 was the year a civil war broke out in Iraq between the Shias and the Sunnis, which ended the Unravelling optimism about the whole world becoming democratic. In his Decision Points Bush claims this was also the year nativism became popular again. So I say: the crisis started in 2006 and thus it's reasonable to end Millennials in 2001 or even 2003.

I think Xennial is BS because I can't relate to the stuff about Tinder or social justice or infantilizing the world and being easily offended or thinking I was lied to yet I'm core Millennial. Since I'm core Millennial and can't relate to this I can say the cusp is a BS construct that assumes too much about the core. I'm "core Millennial" yet I can't relate to thinking "society" influences your views more than critical thinking whereas others think I am "supposed to" not be able to learn anything on my own or think anything on my own or that I am "supposed to" want to ban everything because I supposedly don't believe in people's abilities to decipher their own information despite whatever "society" says. I hate how the generation police want to force me to think a certain way or that I "should" not be myself because I am "supposed to" copy the group.

You want to have your own generational category because you don't relate to stereotypes. I don't either so what makes you so different? If I am a "core Millennial" yet think this way it means that the category of Xennial is bunk and garbage. Is there something magical in my brain that forces me to think the same as everyone on social media just because my parents had sex in a certain year? Because I often disagree with what others think in all generations and can't relate to any generation in particular. Where is this magical part of my brain? Do tell. It seems like you just want a category to shove others into stereotypes where you get to play the fence.

I think cusps are valid, because an exact border is always fuzzy, and at the crossover times different folks can be more influenced by the upcoming trends than the older ones. They should be narrowly drawn, though, and based on S&H dates and not Pew dates. So I would say
War Baby cusp: c. 1941-45
Jones cusp (BoomerXer): c. 1958-63
Xennials: 1979-85
Gen Y/Z cusp: 2001-2005

The closer to the border one was born, the more of a mixture one is.

Of course no-one fits a stereotype, and the archetype does not fit all people born into it. It's a general trend, which means there are exceptions. But the trend is significant and meaningful. Apsiemillennial is not a typical Millennial, and I am a typical Boomer, but none of that means that the cusps are bunk, or that the generational archetypes are bunk.

In my case, my astrology chart clearly indicates that I identify with my generation. The same can be said for Mr. Howe, whose Moon (heritage, ancestry, family influences, etc) aligns with his Uranus in Cancer (the Moon's ruling sign), and Uranus is the chief generational planet of the saeculum. Myself, I have Uranus exactly rising in Cancer, Mars exactly conjunct Pluto in Leo, and Sun conjunct closely with Neptune in Libra. Personal indicators aligned with generational planets, QED. I would guess Aspiemillennial does not have such alignments.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive;
Eric M
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: "Core" vs. "Non-Core" Semi-Generations - by Eric the Green - 07-31-2019, 12:41 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Generations and Big 5 Personality JasonBlack 9 1,356 12-27-2022, 02:43 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Homophobia in different generations JasonBlack 2 739 07-23-2022, 07:46 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Sub-Generations JasonBlack 3 1,017 05-07-2022, 11:33 PM
Last Post: galaxy
  The advantage of recessive generations JasonBlack 2 1,092 03-17-2022, 06:35 PM
Last Post: galaxy
  What are the Generations of other countries Phantom 0 926 12-28-2021, 07:24 AM
Last Post: Phantom
  Current anomaly: Five generations alive! Hintergrund 90 48,055 12-12-2021, 02:10 PM
Last Post: Anthony '58
  Why do S&H start Civic generations so early? Blazkovitz 24 12,154 09-04-2021, 09:42 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  LPTs for the generations to live up to their archetypal role sbarrera 27 9,763 07-26-2021, 11:13 PM
Last Post: galaxy
  Is it typical for adjacent generations to not know each other all that well? nguyenivy 3 1,875 06-29-2021, 07:09 PM
Last Post: AspieMillennial
  Why cultural "generations" are flawed Ghost 14 7,185 06-17-2021, 07:47 AM
Last Post: Ghost

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)