Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bipartisan Senate group proposes ‘no fly, no buy’ gun measure
(05-03-2018, 06:45 PM)Bob Butler 54 Wrote:
(05-03-2018, 05:17 PM)Classic-Xer Wrote: Well, you have a right to choose to have a dog for defense like you seem to prefer and the right choose to have a gun for defense like me and the right to choose to have both them like me too. Thank God, we still live in America.

The problem is that both factions are trying to force their life style and approach to defense on the other.  The blues seek criminals who cannot acquire a weapon.  The reds seek the traditional ability to defend one's self, family and community.  Both are desirable goals from my point of view, but many see the weapons as available or unavailable to all.   There is a perception that if the other guy's goal is achieved, one is frustrated in achieving one's own goal.

I might have that perception, and I suppose therefore you can say that "there is a perception" of that, even though I recognize the need to compromise. But on the blue side, as the blue side and I keep pointing out to no apparent avail, you can hardly find any gun control advocates who want to force their lifestyle on the other side. They still support the second amendment and non-military gun ownership for qualified folks. Meanwhile, the reds (and especially the NRA leadership and all who support their policies) DO want to stop people who live in cities awash in guns from regulating them.

There is this catch, though; the blues also advocate that the guns be stored where criminals can't readily steal them. That is the upshot of "The blues seek criminals who cannot acquire a weapon." And that makes it harder for a gun to provide defense. I suppose a dog's or an alarm's warning might avail some possibility of time for unlocking and loading a weapon for defense. It's still a risky and unpredictable situation.

Risky to your self, your family, and a perceived intruder who may turn out to be harmless, and thus risky for you becoming a criminal for shooting him or her. And risky for you too if you lose self-control or your ethics and you become a criminal yourself. Risky too whenever the gun becomes unlocked and loaded for any other reason.
"I close my eyes, and I can see a better day" -- Justin Bieber

Keep the spirit alive;
Eric M
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Bipartisan Senate group proposes ‘no fly, no buy’ gun measure - by Eric the Green - 05-03-2018, 10:42 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  House passes bill to expand background checks for gun sales HealthyDebate 49 7,184 11-22-2022, 02:22 PM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Hawaii bill would allow gun seizure after hospitalization nebraska 23 11,731 06-08-2022, 05:46 PM
Last Post: beechnut79
  Young Americans have rapidly turned against gun control, poll finds Einzige 5 2,156 04-30-2021, 08:09 AM
Last Post: David Horn
  2022 elections: House, Senate, State governorships pbrower2a 13 3,902 04-28-2021, 04:55 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Kyrsten Synema (D - Az) brings a cake into the Senate to downvote min. wage hike Einzige 104 27,389 04-22-2021, 03:21 AM
Last Post: pbrower2a
  Hawaii Senate approves nation’s highest income tax rate HealthyDebate 0 776 03-12-2021, 06:46 PM
Last Post: HealthyDebate
  House of Delegates Passes Sweeping Gun-Control Bill stillretired 6 1,932 03-10-2021, 01:43 AM
Last Post: Kate1999
  Biden faces bipartisan backlash over Syria bombing Kate1999 0 716 03-09-2021, 07:01 PM
Last Post: Kate1999
  U.S. House set to vote on bills to expand gun background checks Adar 0 752 03-08-2021, 07:37 AM
Last Post: Adar
  Senate passes bill to ban foreigner home purchases newvoter 2 1,098 02-28-2021, 07:09 AM
Last Post: newvoter

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)